Grace Priscilla Jero wrote:
> Below is our scenario on DTLS.
> We have multiple connections to the same server. We have mapped one fd
> to the ssl in the server to receive all connections.
Are these connections from the same client (same 5-tuple), or are you just
talking about multi
Priscilla Hero wrote:
> Hi Michael, Without doing ssl_accept on the ssl will getpeername work?
ssl_accept() processes the packets on the socket.
getpeername() on a (Unix) socket will always work.
However, getpeername() on a UDP socket won't produce anything unless the
socket was connect(2)'
J Decker wrote:
> I'm not 100% sure what you're doing I'd imagine that if SSL was
> managing the fd's you wouldn't have this issue. You hvae to call
> accept() to get a new FD... and you'll only get that once, so when you
> accept() you should attach the bio and call ssl_accept()
I'm not 100% sure what you're doing
I'd imagine that if SSL was managing the fd's you wouldn't have this issue.
You hvae to call accept() to get a new FD... and you'll only get that once,
so when you accept() you should attach the bio and call ssl_accept(), no?
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 5:52 PM, Pri
