On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Jerry OELoo wrote:
> Hi.
> I found there is a website which has https support.
> https://www.ib-channel.net/miegin/web/jsp/B02-01.jsp
> and browser can show its certificate chain.
> but when I use openssl to connect website, it returns fail.
>
> openssl s_client -
On 26 mai 2015, at 05:17, Jerry OELoo wrote:
> Hi.
> I found there is a website which has https support.
> https://www.ib-channel.net/miegin/web/jsp/B02-01.jsp
> and browser can show its certificate chain.
> but when I use openssl to connect website, it returns fail.
Openssl works great here:
Hi.
I found there is a website which has https support.
https://www.ib-channel.net/miegin/web/jsp/B02-01.jsp
and browser can show its certificate chain.
but when I use openssl to connect website, it returns fail.
openssl s_client -connect www.ib-channel.net:443
CONNECTED(0003)
write:errno=104
Hi,
> I have an application that runs quite happily using OpenSSL 1.0.1h on Solaris
> 32 bit. I want to upgrade but neither 1.0.2 nor 1.0.2a work.
>
> Solaris 10
> Solaris Studio 12.4
>
> Make test log attached.
>
> 1 When building 1.0.2 using
>
> ./Configure solaris-sparcv9-cc no-shared -m32
On 15-05-2015 00:09, Jay Foster wrote:
What is the down side of truncating a hash? For example, an SHA-256
hash is 256 bits. Is it any less secure if one was to drop the last
128 bits to make a 128 bit hash or take the MD5 hash of the SHA-256
hash to get a 128 bit hash? It does not seem that
On 05/15/2015 12:09 AM, Jay Foster wrote:
What is the down side of truncating a hash? For example, an SHA-256
hash is 256 bits. Is it any less secure if one was to drop the last
128 bits to make a 128 bit hash or take the MD5 hash of the SHA-256
hash to get a 128 bit hash? It does not seem t
