unsubscribe openssl-users
___
openssl-users mailing list
openssl-users@openssl.org
https://mta.opensslfoundation.net/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
> What I'd find useful would be a branch for me to test with
Well, the release doc says our goal is year-end release with a previous
mid-year. Once 1.0.2 goes out, I would assume that 'master' will get a lot of
activity in that area, and you can try with that.
>Note that I think the goal of m
> But I despise having to go to the
> memory manager for something like a BN_CTX that could live on the stack.
Sorry, but that's the way it's gonna be. There are plenty of things to despise
in OpenSSL, I wouldn't have put "must allocate structures from the heap"
anywhere near the top of my list
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2014, Ken Goldman wrote:
>
>> >Version 1.1.0 will (moderately) break source compatibility (for example we
>> >will make most structures opaque etc).
>>
>> I as a user, I have two points of concern"
>>
>> 1 - Will the RSA
What I'd find useful would be a branch for me to test with so that I can
let you know areas where we're having to get into the guts of an openssl
structure right now that will be opaque in future. IIRC last time I tried
using the define to minimise the exposed api (I forget what it was called)
ther
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014, Ken Goldman wrote:
> >Version 1.1.0 will (moderately) break source compatibility (for example we
> >will make most structures opaque etc).
>
> I as a user, I have two points of concern"
>
> 1 - Will the RSA structure be opaque? I have a continuing need to
> construct an R
> 1 - Will the RSA structure be opaque? I have a continuing need to construct
> an RSA structure from binary arrays of public and private key parts and vice
> versa.
>
> Will I lose that?
Maybe. Proposing new "constructors" that met your needs is probably a good
thing to do.
> 2 - The SHA con
Version 1.1.0 will (moderately) break source compatibility (for example we will
make most structures opaque etc).
I as a user, I have two points of concern"
1 - Will the RSA structure be opaque? I have a continuing need to
construct an RSA structure from binary arrays of public and private k
