Hello,
We used gsoap server with openssl in our application server and encountered
SSL_accept error when the server threads was pooled to limit the number
of threads serving the requests simultaneously. Here is the excerpt of our
log:
Request #1 accepted on socket 4 connected from IP 10.117.2.40
> So if i go on and change the openssl code to offload ECC operations, will i
> be breaking any license?
If you are buying off-the-shelf hardware, then the vendor probably has the
necessary licenses.
If you are building your own hardware, purely for your exploration and
discovery, then it is
hi all,
i encounter strange behavior of SSL_write, which causes program to
loop and take 100% cpu. i admit the handling of the library is not
ideal in this case, but nevertheless i think that the function should
return error, not to loop.
see attatched source file - there is simple server which ha
Hello,
We use openssl im our application servers and encounter the following
problem on SunOS Solaris 5.9 on SPARC:
the used call
r = BIO_gets(slnpSSL[i].io, buf, maxlen);
sslError = SSL_get_error(slnpSSL[i].ssl, r);
switch (sslError) {
case SSL_ERROR_NONE:
I found my memory leak origin. I didn't free an X509 object when I called
SSL_get_peer_certificate function (missing X509_free() call). Hope it will be
useful for others
Cheers!!
From: hicham55...@hotmail.com
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: Memory leak in ssl3_get_server_certificate
My problem was that my server certificate was not SHA-256 capable. As
soon as I generated a new server certificate based on an openssl that
supported SHA-256, I was able to communicate with the server.
From: Jerry Blasdel/USA/CSC@CSC
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Date: 04/03/2014 11
Hi ,
I want to offload the operations done in fundamental ECC (all curves)
to a hardware to improve the performance. After going through the
openssl-1.0.1e code i found out that there are some code contributed
by Sun Microsystems (now Oracle). A little search on internet
revealed that Certicom ho
