I was just curious, cuz other people have spelled it that way as well.
And I just wanted to be sure. Thanks.
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:29 PM, wrote:
> Congrats! you caught my typing error.
> Steven J. Hathaway
>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Is the name spelt Rijndael or Rijndahl?
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013
Congrats! you caught my typing error.
Steven J. Hathaway
> Thanks.
>
> Is the name spelt Rijndael or Rijndahl?
>
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 8:15 PM, wrote:
>> AES/Rijndahl
>>
>> AES has fixed number of rounds and other parameters.
>> Rijndahl allows you to specify the algorithm parameters includi
Thanks.
Is the name spelt Rijndael or Rijndahl?
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 8:15 PM, wrote:
> AES/Rijndahl
>
> AES has fixed number of rounds and other parameters.
> Rijndahl allows you to specify the algorithm parameters including number
> of rounds.
>
> Steven J. Hathaway
>
>> So is the number of
AES/Rijndahl
AES has fixed number of rounds and other parameters.
Rijndahl allows you to specify the algorithm parameters including number
of rounds.
Steven J. Hathaway
> So is the number of rounds set by Rijndahl or the AES spec? I'm confused.
>
> And is the number of rounds hard-coded into the
Matt,
No reason as such for using low level interface.I just want to get it
done. Do you see any issues with low level interface? or any issues with my
code?
In addition, the server and client works over REST API's, hence I am using
JSON format to pass the parameter over the wire.
Regards,
On 16 March 2013 18:00, azhar jodatti wrote:
>
>
> Thompson,
>
> Really thanks for the reply. appreciate your time.
>
> Yes it was JCE and not JCF. it was typo :)
>
> I am working on application which has android and iPhone client. Both the
> client talk to my server which is written in JAVA. I
On 16.03.2013 19:27, kap...@mizera.cz wrote:
Dne 16.3.2013 12:58, Walter H. napsal(a):
Unfortunately not, it is official paid service.
But You can make tests on testing TSA:
http://www.postsignum.cz/testovaci_casova_razitka.html
I don't understand this language; can you tell me the URL of this
Dne 16.3.2013 12:58, Walter H. napsal(a):
Unfortunately not, it is official paid service.
But You can make tests on testing TSA:
http://www.postsignum.cz/testovaci_casova_razitka.html
I don't understand this language; can you tell me the URL of this Test TSA?
Try to use translate.google.com
Thompson,
Really thanks for the reply. appreciate your time.
Yes it was JCE and not JCF. it was typo :)
I am working on application which has android and iPhone client. Both the
client talk to my server which is written in JAVA. I am using JCE
implementation of DH algorithm and X509EncodedkeySp
SORRY - now with attachment :-)
Dne 15.3.2013 22:34, Peter Sylvester napsal(a):
for those who don't read openssl-dev
Thanks - I did not know that it is discussed there too.
I have no experiences with patching, compiling, .. so I have to wait for
package in repo or PPA.
=>
If you have the up
Dne 15.3.2013 22:34, Peter Sylvester napsal(a):
for those who don't read openssl-dev
Thanks - I did not know that it is discussed there too.
I have no experiences with patching, compiling, .. so I have to wait for
package in repo or PPA.
=>
If you have the updated version, could you please
Dne 15.3.2013 20:24, Walter H. napsal(a):
are you shure this TSA is working at all?
Of course, it is the One TSA in our coutry.
can you give me for a try userid and pwd, then I may find out where the
bug is;
Unfortunately not, it is official paid service.
But You can make tests on testing
Ok, I've got a very weird issue involving OpenSSL 1.0.1e with FIPS. When I
run my test application which uses a dynamic dll, every other attempt will
fail with this error:
error:2D09F086:FIPS routines:FIPS_digestupdate:selftest failed
This happens with both checked and free builds.
I'm using VS
Is there a mailing list that I can ask Rijndael-specific questions?
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 3:25 AM, Ewen Chan wrote:
> Interesting...
>
> Does this necessarily implicitly implies that the Rijndael cipher was
> selected as the AES "winner" because it was also "simple" enough to be
> fast, while m
Interesting...
Does this necessarily implicitly implies that the Rijndael cipher was
selected as the AES "winner" because it was also "simple" enough to be
fast, while meeting the security and protection requirements when they
initiated the open call for proposals?
I didn't realize that the AES a
15 matches
Mail list logo
