The OpenSSL 1.0.1c lib version after compiled

2012-06-29 Thread Zhu Yang
Hi, I download the openssl 1.0.1c and compiled on linux. But I found the lib I got is libssl.so.1.0.0. Is there any problem for this version? Thank you. Regards Zhu

Re: Client certificate verification

2012-06-29 Thread Sukalp Bhople
Hi Dave, Thank you very much for the detailed reply. Following is the code I used at server side program. while (1) { SSL *ssl = SSL_new(ctx); SSL_set_fd(ssl, clientserver[1]); if (SSL_accept(ssl) != 1) break; result.handshakes++; SSL_set_shutdown(ssl, SSL_SENT_SHUTDOWN);

RE: [FWD] BUG: base64

2012-06-29 Thread Dave Thompson
> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Lutz Jaenicke > Sent: Friday, 29 June, 2012 15:10 > Forwarded to openssl-users for public discussion (attachment: 80-char lines of base64 that didn't decode) OpenSSL BIO_f_base64 by default tries to nearly enforce the MIME limit of 76 encoded

RE: Client certificate verification

2012-06-29 Thread Dave Thompson
>From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Sukalp Bhople >Sent: Friday, 29 June, 2012 15:30 >I am trying to measure server performance for client certificate verification. >However, there is no significant difference in the server performance >when I send one certificate and condition

Re: Client certificate verification

2012-06-29 Thread Peter Sylvester
On 06/29/2012 09:29 PM, Sukalp Bhople wrote: Hello, I am trying to measure server performance for client certificate verification. However, there is no significant difference in the server performance when I send one certificate and condition when I send chain of 10 certificates. I am aware

Re: reg versioning in 1.2.4

2012-06-29 Thread Steve Marquess
On 06/29/2012 06:57 AM, Ganesh Gudaru wrote: > I have downloaded the version openssl-fips-1.2.4 > When i built this version, i see the file version as 0.9.8.6 and the > product version as 1.2 > > I am already using the version 0.9.8o and this has a file version of 0.9.8.15 > Also when i see the ve

[FWD] BUG: base64

2012-06-29 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
Forwarded to openssl-users for public discussion Best regards, Lutz -- Lutz Jaenicke jaeni...@openssl.org OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org/~jaenicke/ --- Begin Message --- I found a possible bug with base64 decoding, the following block can't be decoded by openssl:

reg versioning in 1.2.4

2012-06-29 Thread Ganesh Gudaru
I have downloaded the version openssl-fips-1.2.4 When i built this version, i see the file version as 0.9.8.6 and the product version as 1.2 I am already using the version 0.9.8o and this has a file version of 0.9.8.15 Also when i see the version, this version says 0.9.8o-fips which confused me as

FIPS in 1.0.1?

2012-06-29 Thread Dirk Menstermann
Anybody able to help me? Thanks a lot Dirk On 27.06.2012 14:42, Dirk Menstermann wrote: > Hello, > > I tried to build the FIPS version (openssl-fips-2.0.1) on win7 and VS2005 > (command line prompt) using the build target debug-VC-WIN64A and option > no-asm. > > Compilation of the fipscanister