Great many thanks, Jeff!
-Original Message-
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org]
On Behalf Of Jeffrey Walton
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 6:51 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: Which versions of OpenSSL support TLS V1.1 and TLS V1.2..
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 3:43 PM, John A. Wallace wrote:
> I do appreciate the excellent support I have gotten with this program. Thank
> you.
Shining Light and Thomas do a great job with the pre-built binaries.
The foundation might consider incorporating some of his work since not
everyone wants t
Hi Mike,
>From the Change Log (http://www.openssl.org/news/changelog.html):
Changes between 1.0.0h and 1.0.1 [14 Mar 2012]
* Initial TLS v1.2 support
* Add TLS v1.2 server support for client authentication.
* Add server support for TLS v1.2 signature algorithms extension.
* Initial TLS v1
Hello,
Can someone please let me know which versions of OpenSSL support TLS V1.1 and
TLS V1.2?
Thanks,
Mike
Michael Greenberg
Senior Manager of Engineering
ITIL v3 Foundation Certified
Service Automation - BladeLogic
BMC Software
office: 781.257.3614
mobile: 617.240.3433
fax: 781.861.0171
mic
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-
> us...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Thomas J. Hruska
> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 11:08 PM
> To: openssl-users@openssl.org
> Subject: Re: Win32OpenSSL.html
>
> On 6/20/2012 11:12 AM, John wrote:
> > "Jo
I do appreciate the excellent support I have gotten with this program. Thank
you.
John
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org]
On Behalf Of Gerald L Collins
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 3:06 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: Win32Ope
On 06/28/2012 01:17 PM, "Magosányi, Árpád" wrote:
> On 06/28/2012 06:42 PM, Keith Bennett wrote:
>> I do wonder if this is the proper time & place to discuss the
>> implications of requiring source code to have been obtained by a
>> "secure path" excluding the internet. Can an internet-enabled open
On 06/28/2012 06:42 PM, Keith Bennett wrote:
> I do wonder if this is the proper time & place to discuss the
> implications of requiring source code to have been obtained by a
> "secure path" excluding the internet. Can an internet-enabled open
> source therefore be considered "secure" by that defi
On 06/28/2012 12:42 PM, Keith Bennett wrote:
> I do wonder if this is the proper time & place to discuss the
> implications of requiring source code to have been obtained by a "secure
> path" excluding the internet. Can an internet-enabled open source
> therefore be considered "secure" by that defi
I do wonder if this is the proper time & place to discuss the implications
of requiring source code to have been obtained by a "secure path" excluding
the internet. Can an internet-enabled open source therefore be considered
"secure" by that definition?
--
Keith Bennett
Hello,
I want to record the handshake messages between server and client into the
file and replay them later.
For example, when I run s-server command with -debug option, I get some
output like follows:
read from 0x9482088 [0x948d518] (2064 bytes => 2064 (0x810))
- 0b 00 08 0c 00 08 09 00-0
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012, Robert Foss wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting differing results from AES_set_encrypt_key() depending on which
> architecture I'm compiling for.
> As far as I understand it, key expansion is deterministic which would mean
> that something else is wrong.
>
> I've set up a simple
Hi,
We are generating signed profile using open SSL it is working fine in existing
production server (Windows) and signed profile also opening through IE and
Firefox.
Now we are moving to new windows server, we are facing some issue with signed
profile
After executing command signed profile i
13 matches
Mail list logo
