On Tue, May 29, 2012, Naveen Nathan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to understand the distinction between:
>
> EVP_DigestSign* and EVP_Sign*. I'm trying to understand how openssl
> performs HMAC on the command line. It seems to use the EVP_DigestSign
> with a key type EVP_PKEY* which stores a symmet
Hi,
I'm trying to understand the distinction between:
EVP_DigestSign* and EVP_Sign*. I'm trying to understand how openssl
performs HMAC on the command line. It seems to use the EVP_DigestSign
with a key type EVP_PKEY* which stores a symmetric MAC key.
Is EVP_DigestSign* specifically different so
>From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Erwann Abalea
>Sent: Tuesday, 29 May, 2012 10:13
>Yes to everything.
Minor caveat: OpenSSL supports signatures using SHA256
*with RSA and ECDSA* back to 0.9.8 and I think 0.9.7,
but SHA256 (and SHA224) with DSA only since 1.0.0.
(As I recall
Le lundi 28 mai 2012 à 17:25 -0400, Dave Thompson a écrit :
> > From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of ml
> > Sent: Saturday, 26 May, 2012 16:18
>
> > I try to realize as base64 encoding
> > char *base64(char *input, int length)
> > {
> > BIO *bmem, *b64;
> > BUF_MEM *bptr;
> >
>
On 29/05/12 16:55, chip...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
thank you again for your answer.
Now I set for every variable the BN_FLG_CONSTIME Flag, so that I can be sure,
that they will need the same time.
I measured the time the BN_nnmod operation in the BN_mod_add function needs for
the modulo operation a
> From: Jakob Bohm [mailto:jb-open...@wisemo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 8:34 AM
> On 5/27/2012 2:29 AM, Jeremy Farrell wrote:
> >> From: Jakob Bohm [mailto:jb-open...@wisemo.com]
> >> On 5/25/2012 5:30 PM, Ken Goldman wrote:
> >>> On 5/25/2012 3:33 AM, Jakob Bohm wrote:
> >>>
> ANSI C
I forwarded this to the EFI list, for a response from Intel:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=29329799
Original Message
Subject: Re: [edk2] Fwd: Re: UEFI Authenticode Code - is it any good?
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 08:47:51 +
From: Long, Qin
Reply-To: ed
Hi,
I was hoping to get some insight on renegotiation issues I've been having.
The program I've been developing is using OpenSSL in C++ and is a small
client/server application. But I am writing directly to memory bios and
SSL as to use our existing socket server. Everything so far seems to
Hi,
thank you again for your answer.
Now I set for every variable the BN_FLG_CONSTIME Flag, so that I can be sure,
that they will need the same time.
I measured the time the BN_nnmod operation in the BN_mod_add function needs for
the modulo operation and I see again big differences in the oper
Yes to everything.
As your question is not about the development of OpenSSL, but instead
about its use, it should have been better in the openssl-users mailing list.
Le 28/05/2012 15:43, Manas Ranjan Lenka a écrit :
Hi,
In addition to the below queries we have one more query in our mind.
Pl
> From: Jakob Bohm
> Which version of the ANSI Spec, and where did you get a copy?
>
> I have to rely on secondary sources and experience using various
> implementations that claim conformance.
I generally refer to Plauger's "The Standard C Library", where he quotes
the spec with commentary an
On 5/28/2012 5:19 PM, Brian Powell wrote:
Hello,
Last year we deployed a root and intermediary CA's to support a web
service - We have now found some issues with the root CA and need to
fix them.
We have many clients in many organisations which have installed the
old root cert - There is curr
On 5/27/2012 2:29 AM, Jeremy Farrell wrote:
From: Jakob Bohm [mailto:jb-open...@wisemo.com]
On 5/25/2012 5:30 PM, Ken Goldman wrote:
On 5/25/2012 3:33 AM, Jakob Bohm wrote:
ANSI C and POSIX free() is NOT required to handle free(NULL)
as a NOP.
I checked reputable sources (Plauger, Harbison an
13 matches
Mail list logo
