> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Jakob Bohm
> Sent: Wednesday, 18 April, 2012 07:57
> On 4/17/2012 7:00 PM, Nou Dadoun wrote:
> > Quick question regarding certificate usage in an ssl
> connection; you can associate a number of certificates with a
> server endpoint - is there
> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Stéphane Charette
> Sent: Sunday, 15 April, 2012 20:31
> I'm using Openssl to talk to a server that expects to re-use ssl
> sessions when a client needs to open many SSL connections. I have
> the same code working on Linux a
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012, Claus Assmann wrote:
> As I'm having some problems understanding the ASN.1 parsing code,
> I would like to ask here for feedback about the bug. DKIM-Filter
> (OpenDKIM) uses d2i_PUBKEY_bio() with a key (input) that is at most
> 1KB long.
>
> According to the advisory:
>
>
As I'm having some problems understanding the ASN.1 parsing code,
I would like to ask here for feedback about the bug. DKIM-Filter
(OpenDKIM) uses d2i_PUBKEY_bio() with a key (input) that is at most
1KB long.
According to the advisory:
> Any application which uses BIO or FILE based functions to
Hello,
I have to decrypt a stream of data encrypted with TDES and TOFB-I mode
of operation.
Which are the differences between TOFB and TOFB-I modes of operation?
Are they somewhat compatible, so that I can use TOFB (implemented in
OpenSSL)?
Thanks and regards,
Luca
Thank you Steve.
I have used the rsa tool to convert the PKCS#8 format key to RSA format and
then the embedded system was fine with.
Best regards,
Daniel Doron
Customer Support & FAE Manager
Connect One
20 Atir Yeda st.
Kfar Saba 44643 Israel
Phone: 972-9-7660456 x138
Mobile: 972-54-4959659
__
Thanks Richard.
That helps the choke part. Now I can investigate the actual error in our
system.
Best regards,
Daniel Doron
Customer Support & FAE Manager
Connect One
20 Atir Yeda st.
Kfar Saba 44643 Israel
Phone: 972-9-7660456 x138
Mobile: 972-54-4959659
__
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012, Daniel Doron wrote:
>
> I have noticed the following command sequence generates Private Key files
> with different Header. Is there a reason for this?? You will also notice
> that the character count is different.
>
> The first private key cause our embedded system (not Lin
Am 19.04.2012 14:05, schrieb Daniel Doron:
Hi,
I have noticed the following command sequence generates Private Key
files with different _Header_. Is there a reason for this?? You will
A quick look into the source gave me no strong hint whether this is
intended, is a bug or is sloppiness not q
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OpenSSL Security Advisory [19 Apr 2012]
===
ASN1 BIO vulnerability (CVE-2012-2110)
===
A potentially exploitable vulnerability has been discovered in the OpenSSL
function asn1_d2
Hi,
I have noticed the following command sequence generates Private Key files
with different Header. Is there a reason for this?? You will also notice
that the character count is different.
The first private key cause our embedded system (not Linux, proprietary) to
choke while the second one w
11 matches
Mail list logo