On May 24, 2011, at 5:42 PM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011, Bill Durant wrote:
>
>> On May 24, 2011, at 3:58 PM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 24, 2011, ciphertexto wrote:
>>>
On May 24, 2011, at 4:18 AM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
>
> It can take a lon
On Tue, May 24, 2011, Bill Durant wrote:
> On May 24, 2011, at 3:58 PM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> > On Tue, May 24, 2011, ciphertexto wrote:
> >
> >> On May 24, 2011, at 4:18 AM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> >>>
> >>> It can take a long time to execute sometimes as it performs two slow DH
> >>>
On May 24, 2011, at 3:58 PM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011, ciphertexto wrote:
>
>> On May 24, 2011, at 4:18 AM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
>>>
>>> It can take a long time to execute sometimes as it performs two slow DH
>>> parameter generation operations. Retry it a few times.
Hi,
I am compiling and running open ssl fips compliant version and trying to
run the power on self tests during boot up time as part of FIPS
requirements. I have observed invokation of zeroization function as well as
output displayed as part of this function. Here are questions
a) What is the in
On Tue, May 24, 2011, ciphertexto wrote:
> On May 24, 2011, at 4:18 AM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> >
> > It can take a long time to execute sometimes as it performs two slow DH
> > parameter generation operations. Retry it a few times. If it still doesn't
> > complete try:
> >
> > OPENSSL_FIPS=
On 05/24/11 3:26 PM, Eric S. Eberhard wrote:
If you tried to open it in Winzip (which can open tar files and tar.gz
files) you can see if it is the Solaris or the file.
To have Winzip do the tar.gz rename it to simply .tgz ...
You could always transfer it from your PC if you do it this way --
On May 24, 2011, at 4:18 AM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011, ciphertexto wrote:
>
>> On May 23, 2011, at 7:20 PM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 22, 2011, Bill Durant wrote:
>>>
Hello,
Has anyone been able to build a "working" 64-bit version of the
>>
If you tried to open it in Winzip (which can open tar files and
tar.gz files) you can see if it is the Solaris or the file.
To have Winzip do the tar.gz rename it to simply .tgz ...
You could always transfer it from your PC if you do it this way -- if
you are running Samba on the Solaris it is
> From: John R Pierce
> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 9:20 PM
>
> On 05/24/11 12:53 PM, Kyle Hamilton wrote:
> > I don't think that Solaris's tar hits the bug every time. Do you
> > think Oracle (nee Sun) would ship something that failed 100% of the
> > time instead of 0.1% of the time?
>
> bug
winzip will open tar files ... E
At 01:20 PM 5/24/2011, you wrote:
On 05/24/11 12:53 PM, Kyle Hamilton wrote:
I don't think that Solaris's tar hits the bug every time. Do you
think Oracle (nee Sun) would ship something that failed 100% of the
time instead of 0.1% of the time?
bug? no, this
John,
The OP said that he gunzipped it in-place before doing tar xvf. It -is- a bug
in Solaris tar, and it's known in many different places. One of which is here:
http://docs.activestate.com/activetcl/8.5/at.install.html
It appears that there are two separate issues involved. First, Solaris
Xac,
You seem to be looking for a utility which provides access much like tar or
cpio. I'm sorry to have to report that this does not exist the way you seem to
expect. If you want something that can automagically do everything that you
need to accomplish from the command-line, I recommend GN
On 05/24/11 12:53 PM, Kyle Hamilton wrote:
I don't think that Solaris's tar hits the bug every time. Do you
think Oracle (nee Sun) would ship something that failed 100% of the
time instead of 0.1% of the time?
bug? no, this is not a bug.
native posix tar doesn't read gzip files, gzip does.
Well, Ryan
I don't think that Solaris's tar hits the bug every time. Do you think Oracle
(nee Sun) would ship something that failed 100% of the time instead of 0.1% of
the time?
Just try GNU tar. See if it works. That's what's used to create the tarball
in the first place, and GNU tar has
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 01:50, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
>> > The command-line argument "-md" to "openssl cms -sign_receipt" is
>> > apparently ignored, and the default digest algorithm (SHA-1 in my
>> > tests) is used instead.
>
> At present this is a
I have just moved a website from a Fedora 10 server to RedHat 5.5.
On the Fedora the openssl version was 0.9.8g. On RedHat it is
0.9.8e-fips-rhel5
Lots of client PC's have the digital certificate installed in IE, and the
users of the PC's would like to continue using IE as their other systems
re
Sorry, I’ve made a mistake L
if(!EVP_VerifyUpdate(&v_ctx, out, outlen)){
MUST CHANGE TO = > EVP_VerifyUpdate(&v_ctx, inbuf, inbuflen)
发件人: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-users@openssl.
org] 代表 bs1
发送时间: 2011年5月24日 22:52
收件人: openssl
On Mon, May 23, 2011, ciphertexto wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does any one know how can any application work 100% reliably with a
> FIPS-capable OpenSSL given the following requirement from page 33 of the
> OpenSSL UserGuide at http://www.openssl.org/docs/fips/UserGuide.pdf:
>
> ===
> "The
On Tue, May 24, 2011, xaccrocheur wrote:
> Hi everyone ; This is my first msg on the list
>
> I'd like to know if there are any specifications I can read about
> the .pem format ? From what I understand it is a "container"
> meta-format, like ogg or avi, so how do I know how to read it, what
> to
> I'd like to know if there are any specifications I can read about the .pem
> format
See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privacy-enhanced_Electronic_Mail
and the mentioned RFCs. Although Privacy Enhanced Email is not
widespread as such, the formatting of messages *is* used (e.g. for PEM
fil
Well, Kyle
I don't think tar is the problem here. After I had the problem with v1.2.3, I
downloaded fips 1.2.2 afterwards and I don't have problem to untar the tar ball.
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org]
On Behalf Of
Hello,
EVP_VerifyFinal fail when use RSA public key, can anyone help?
I use openssl cmd line tool generate a key pair of RSA and store them to two
pem files.
And RSA_sign and RSA_verify work fine with the pem files.
To support large buffer , I change the code to work with EVP_Sign and
EVP_Ve
On Mon, May 23, 2011, ciphertexto wrote:
> On May 23, 2011, at 7:20 PM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> > On Sun, May 22, 2011, Bill Durant wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Has anyone been able to build a "working" 64-bit version of the
> >> FIPS-capable OpenSSL on Mac OS X 10.6.7 (SnowLeopard)?
>
Hi everyone ; This is my first msg on the list
I'd like to know if there are any specifications I can read about the
.pem format ? From what I understand it is a "container" meta-format,
like ogg or avi, so how do I know how to read it, what to expect and how
to properly write it ? I found not
On Mon, May 23, 2011, drachs wrote:
>
> I'm trying to parse a certificate for the DNS names of the site it's for.
> Unfortunately, all the examples I can find don't bother releasing any of the
> ram they acquire! So I'm left trying to figure it out myself because I
> need to parse a few hundr
I'm trying to parse a certificate for the DNS names of the site it's for.
Unfortunately, all the examples I can find don't bother releasing any of the
ram they acquire! So I'm left trying to figure it out myself because I
need to parse a few hundred of these a second. In addition, I can't se
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 01:50, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
>> > The command-line argument "-md" to "openssl cms -sign_receipt" is
>> > apparently ignored, and the default digest algorithm (SHA-1 in my
>> > tests) is used instead.
>
> At present this is a
27 matches
Mail list logo
