RE: the format of speed about sha1

> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of loody > Sent: Friday, 22 April, 2011 08:56 > hi all: > I am quite curious about the format of openssl speed of digest. > Take sha1 for example, below are the results on my machine: > > The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed. >

Question regarding RFC standard used

Hi, I am wondering what RFC standard is implemented in Openssl version 0.9.8 for verification of certificates. In otherwords, what RFC standard(s) does X509_verify_cert() api implemented? Thanks, Prkj

Re: [PATCH] conversion to EBCDIC

post a unified patch Le vendredi 22 avril 2011 16:08, JOULIN Pierre-Pascal a écrit : > Hi, > I am working on a MAINFRAME. The encoding page is EBCDIC and not ASCII, so > i have to do some conversion to support openssl on a mainframe. I am not > familiar to use this method to open patch so

Re: [PATCH] conversion to EBCDIC

You might find this useful: http://cprogramminglanguage.net/ascii-ebcdic-conversion-functions.aspx Eric At 07:08 AM 4/22/2011, you wrote: Hi, I am working on a MAINFRAME. The encoding page is EBCDIC and not ASCII, so i have to do some conversion to support openssl on a mainframe. I am not

[PATCH] conversion to EBCDIC

Hi, I am working on a MAINFRAME. The encoding page is EBCDIC and not ASCII, so i have to do some conversion to support openssl on a mainframe. I am not familiar to use this method to open patch so it may be confusing. Here is one patch like you ask with the diff tools : diff -r crypto/x509/x50

Open ssl FIS Mode

Hi Team, We are using OpenSSL-Win32 (OpenSSL 1.0.0d) We downloaded openssl-fips-1.2.2.tar.gz . My application for which we are using OpenSSL needs to run in OpenSSL Fips mode. What is the procedure ? How do I call contents of openssl-fips-1.2.2.tar.gz from OpenSSL 1.0.0d and make my applicati

Re: Combining MD5 and SHA-1 to reduce collision probability

Thank you all for your valuable answers. On 22/04/2011 00:33, Dave Thompson wrote: *Accidental* (birthday) collision is about 264 for MD5 and about 280 for SHA-1. > SHA-256 should be much stronger, would this be sufficient > for your needs? Or

the format of speed about sha1

hi all: I am quite curious about the format of openssl speed of digest. Take sha1 for example, below are the results on my machine: The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed. type 16 bytes 64 bytes256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes sha1 1194.73k