I believe you can sort of "get around" that requirement using a
wildcard SSL certificate (e.g. for *.domain.tld). But that only helps
you if you're running multiple subdomains for the same TLD. I think I
heard something about a change to the SSL protocol which would allow
sending of the hostname
http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054
"# Set up SSL protection on your website."
is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip address, when
i want to use ssl on my domain?
thank you
happy Christmas! :)
___
On 12/20/2010 10:49 AM, travis+ml-open...@subspacefield.org wrote:
So a friend ran into this lately;
libnss, at least on Linux, checks that the signing cert (chain) is valid
at the time of signature - as opposed to present time. (It may check
present time as well - not sure on that)
This is
Hi Viktor,
As U suggested I did
1)./ Configure no-zlib no-krb5 no-rc5 no-idea threads shared linux-x86_64
And as desired I saw.
Since you've disabled or enabled at least one
algorithm, you need to do
the following before building:
Hi, recently when we bought certificate from Verisign, our cert has new root
Certificate which is “VeriSign Class 3 Public Primary Certification
Authority - G5”. This cert is quite strange when I run it at the openssl
s_cilent command line, it won't stop at G5, it will go to another cert
"Class
Hi
Thank you for help, but I try to compile and i get the following error:
Creating library out32dll_ARMV4I\capi.lib and object out32dll_ARMV4I\capi.exp
e_capi.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol CryptSignHashA referenced
in function capi_rsa_sign
e_capi.obj : error LNK2019: unr
Hi,
of course your will FAIL to compile openssl 100b or c because my patch
are NOT included in.
But if you go to my website you will find everything you need to compile
successfully
openssl 100a.
the bug you just mentioned is solved in my version of openssl 100a.
Please do as described in my f
Are you sure you are following the instructions in install.w32 ?
because this file should be created by the configure process etc...
Pierre
Le 21/12/2010 05:17, Lutz Jaenicke a écrit :
Forwarded to openssl-users for public discussion.
Best regards,
Lutz
- Forwarded message from Phi
Just go there : http://delaage.pierre.free.fr
and you will get all the answers you are looking for.
and pray that finally my updates get included in openssl code one day,
something that unfortunately never happened...
and see also this page in openssl rt system :
http://rt.openssl.org/index.h
Forwarded to openssl-users for public discussion.
Best regards,
Lutz
- Forwarded message from Philippe Palazon -
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id
Forwarded to openssl-users for public discussion.
Best regards,
Lutz
- Forwarded message from Cerriman Lima -
From: Cerriman Lima
To: r...@openssl.org
Subject: OPENSSL - Windows CE
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 03:25:42 +
Importance: Normal
Hello
I have an project in windows C
You do not need to build the library unless you want to customize it. If you
do compile it, it can be used with other compilers. I use the downloaded
version with Borland C++Builder 5 and 6, though it was originally built with
VC++, and it works fine.
Ryan Pfeifle
Sr. Programmer
Voice Prin
I see from the faq the notice about a custom openssl in fedora core 7.
We are now at fedora 14 and my version installed from the redhat
repository is:
openssl-1.0.0c-1.fc14.i686
Are we still dealing with a reduced functionality version?
If so, are the options to get around this still th
13 matches
Mail list logo
