Difference in compression usage between openssl0.9.8f and 0.9.8o

Hi, I have been able to successfully connect to the server with compression enabled but there was some difference between the way 0.9.8f and 0.9.8o behave. With compression enabled for openssl 0.9.8f packet capture shows null compression as an option. With compression enabled for openssl 0.9.8o p

Re: OpenSSL 64 bit backwards compatibility to 32 bit

On 10/25/10 5:47 PM, Kishore Atreya wrote: Hi all I'm new to OpenSSL and was wondering if the 64 bit package was backwards compatible with the 32 bit package. Also is there a significant difference in the API between the 64 and 32 bit package. its exactly the same code, just compiled for the

OpenSSL 64 bit backwards compatibility to 32 bit

Hi all I'm new to OpenSSL and was wondering if the 64 bit package was backwards compatible with the 32 bit package. Also is there a significant difference in the API between the 64 and 32 bit package. -Kishore -- Kishore Atreya Engineer P&T Ciena Corporation (408) 807-5289 (cell) "...a good an

[FWD] openssl 1.0.0a make FAIL @ multiple missing/redefined header errors, only on Ubuntu 10 LTS

Forwarded to openssl-users for public discussion. Best regards, Lutz - Forwarded message from pgngw+dev001+openss...@f-m.fm - From: pgngw+dev001+openss...@f-m.fm To: r...@openssl.org Subject: openssl 1.0.0a make FAIL @ multiple missing/redefined header errors, only on Ubu