Is there a way to make asn1parse print out GENERALSTRING values?

2010-10-19 Thread Aleksander Adamowski
Hi! Is there a way to make asn1parse print out GENERALSTRING values? I'm dissecting the Kerberos v5 protocol and it's a large nuisance to mess with offsets and dumping strings manually. There doesn't seem to be any related option documented in asn1parse manual, nor in asn1parse source (http://cvs

Re: Crosscompiling openssl-fips-1.2 for arm-linux - still FIPS compliant?

2010-10-19 Thread Susumu Sai
Similar question. With the problem http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-users@openssl.org/msg58527.html In order to make fipslink.pl work with MKS perl, in fipslink.pl, if I make a change that add a line like below: $sha1_exe =~ s/\\/\//g; - After this change, fipslink.pl will work with

RE: Certificate chaining

2010-10-19 Thread Dave Thompson
> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of liv2luv > Sent: Tuesday, 19 October, 2010 11:26 > I am new to SSL and Certificates. > > I have generated a CSR and certificate for signing. In return > I've got three > certificates. > > a. Root CA's certificate > b. Intermediate Certificate

Re: [patch] LNK4078 and LNK4210 linking with x64 static libs

2010-10-19 Thread Jeffrey Walton
> So I wasted my precious time preparing a patch while someone > else had already posted a patch off-list. Lol... If you're going to throw a tantrum every time someone beats you ta a patch, you owe us a tantrum: WinCE patch: http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-users@openssl.org/msg61765.html Pierr

Certificate chaining

2010-10-19 Thread liv2luv
Hi, I am new to SSL and Certificates. I have generated a CSR and certificate for signing. In return I've got three certificates. a. Root CA's certificate b. Intermediate Certificate c. Server certificate After some searching, understand I need to combine them in the sequence as server, interm

Re: [patch] LNK4078 and LNK4210 linking with x64 static libs

2010-10-19 Thread Mounir IDRASSI
Hi, I was not involved in this discussion, but I wanted just to say that patches and other development issues are discussed in the openssl-dev list and all messages sent to r...@openssl.org are also copied to that list not the users list. Anyone interested in OpenSSL internals should join o

Re: [patch] LNK4078 and LNK4210 linking with x64 static libs

2010-10-19 Thread Jakob Bohm
On 19-10-2010 12:32, per frykenvall wrote: Thanks, Jakob! However, I followed Dr. Stephen Hensons advice earlier in this thread and filed a report to the bug tracker, and got a resolution from Andy Polyakov a week ago, based on your suggestion. I've tested it and am fully satisfied: [openss

Re: [patch] LNK4078 and LNK4210 linking with x64 static libs

2010-10-19 Thread per frykenvall
Thanks, Jakob! However, I followed Dr. Stephen Hensons advice earlier in this thread and filed a report to the bug tracker, and got a resolution from Andy Polyakov a week ago, based on your suggestion. I've tested it and am fully satisfied: [openssl.org #2356] Resolved: LNK4078 and LNK4210 li

Re: [FWD] default_crl_days= 365

2010-10-19 Thread Jakob Bohm
Yes, easy, just open openssl.conf in a notepad or another simple text editor and set it to the desired number of days/years. I have done so on our internal CA, and it simply works. If you wish to increase (not decrease) the validity length of your existing CA, you will need to do the following:

[FWD] default_crl_days= 365

2010-10-19 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
Forwarded to openssl-users for discussion. Best regards, Lutz - Forwarded message from Santhosh AP - Reply-To: santhosh...@sifycorp.com From: Santhosh AP To: r...@openssl.org Subject: default_crl_days= 365 Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 10:16:09 +0530 Thread-Index: ActvSItTKvsOwU5sQvG6