I have several programs that I am trying to compile and they compile due to
openssl As an example in trying to compile gobject-introspection-0.6.8, after
the configure, the make fails:
File
"/home/final-sources-lfs-6.6/blfs/gobject-introspection-0.6.8/giscanner/cachestore.py",
line 23, in
Hi,
I'm trying to fix a bug in Python which is specific to OpenSSL 0.9.8m. The
problem is in a FTP test using a blocking socket (client) and a non blocking
socket (server). There are different tests, some tests use a timeout of 2
seconds on the client socket.
Pseudo-code of Python shutdown low
On 11. 3. 2010 17:54, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010, Peter Gubis wrote:
>
>
>> int datasig_len;
>> unsigned char *tobesigned;
>> datasig_len = i2d_X509_REQ_INFO( req->req_info, NULL );
>> tobesigned = (unsigned char *) malloc( datasig_len );
>> if( !tobesigned ) {
All,
Using the command "openssl s_client -connect gmail.google.com:443"
openssl gets the certificate information and stays connected until I
enter QUIT, or the timeout is hit -- about 2 minutes later. I want to
script certificate expiration date checks for out servers. Is there a
command-l
> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Dirk Menstermann
> Sent: Wednesday, 10 March, 2010 10:57
> when I generate DH parameters with:
>
> int bits = 1024;
> DH *params = DH_generate_parameters (bits, DH_GENERATOR_5,
> NULL, NULL);
>
> Can I then later read the value of the bits pa
-dev added, I think this is actually a bug
> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Michael Boman
> Sent: Monday, 01 March, 2010 11:40
> I am using OpenSSL 0.9.8l from
http://www.slproweb.com/products/Win32OpenSSL.html
> I link to these libraries for
> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of eoinmoon
> Sent: Wednesday, 10 March, 2010 11:00
> my attempts have failed to convert an private
> key[generated in java keystore and exported via java code] to
> a PEM format
> which I need for my application.
>
> These are the steps I have d
Hi All,
Any answers to my question(s) below ?
Basically I have to make sure [ IPSec link establishment, Certificates
verification, general TLS/SSL, HTTPS, SSH, SFTP], etc all can support
use of the SHA-2 (specifically sha-256) algorithms !
On my system I have openssl 0.9.8g, and I have opens
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010, Bin Lu wrote:
> It is running on Linux with openSSL 0.9.8d.
>
Ah that's pretty old. I'd suggest trying 0.9.8m. That includes proper
non-blocking I/O support for OCSP with the new function OCSP_sendreq_nbio().
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer.
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010, Adam Grossman wrote:
> hello,
>
> i just built fips 1.2, and then built a FIPs capable OpenSSL 0.9.8l as a
> shared lib. I then took my application, added in FIPS_mode_set(1), and
> it passed. But then i realized i did not switch over in my make file to
> use "CC=fipsld"
hello,
i just built fips 1.2, and then built a FIPs capable OpenSSL 0.9.8l as a
shared lib. I then took my application, added in FIPS_mode_set(1), and
it passed. But then i realized i did not switch over in my make file to
use "CC=fipsld" It still used "CC=gcc -fPIC".
Is the reason why it work
It is running on Linux with openSSL 0.9.8d.
Regards,
-binlu
-Original Message-
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org]
On Behalf Of Dr. Stephen Henson
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 8:13 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: BIO_do_connect(
>From my mind, when you use an FPGA encryption hardware, CPU needs to dump one
>block data into the FPAG and read the result out. This is the time CPU spends
>for the encryption of one block data when the FPGA hardware is used. You need
>to compare this time with the time you spend by doing the
Mark H. Wood wrote:
Notice a few things:
o The OP asked about reducing CPU load, but the answers all talk
about making encryption faster. These are not the same thing.
Offloading encryption might *reduce* throughput of the encrypted
streams, and yet free up CPU time to do other things
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010, Peter Gubis wrote:
>
> int datasig_len;
> unsigned char *tobesigned;
> datasig_len = i2d_X509_REQ_INFO( req->req_info, NULL );
> tobesigned = (unsigned char *) malloc( datasig_len );
> if( !tobesigned ) {
> printf("Unable to alloc mem buffer\n");
> return -
Hi all,
I'm trying to create X509 certificate request signed inside smart card
using PKCS11 interface.
To perform this task I have to perform following steps:
1, create certificate request (X509_new)
2, load public key (X509_REQ_set_pubkey)
3, set up subject name and extensions as required
4, exp
Notice a few things:
o The OP asked about reducing CPU load, but the answers all talk
about making encryption faster. These are not the same thing.
Offloading encryption might *reduce* throughput of the encrypted
streams, and yet free up CPU time to do other things. Encrypted
commun
And that's all he wrote Thanks for that Stephen, it worked... times like
this you kind of go "duh!"... but still learning I suppose [Its my only
excuse].
Excellent forum, loads of info and quick responses... not all are like that,
appreciate it
Regards
Eoin
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
>
We are sorry for the duplicate message.
Thank you all for the good answers.
First of all we have to take a decision of either to use dropbear(embedded
ssh2 protocol,using libtomcrypt libaries) or OpenSSH(using OpenSSL
libaries). We have looked at the two libaries and it looks like libtomcrypt
migh
Hello everybody.
We are two students doing a project about accelerating encryption on an
embedded system. This system is build upon a ARM processor (180MHz) and an
FPGA.
We have built and implemented OpenSSH into the system (running Linux), and
tested the AES encryption in software.
The task is no
20 matches
Mail list logo
