I definitely get better results with the latest snapshot. However I still
don't get my "0 depth lookup:certificate revoked" but instead get a
"0 depth lookup:CRL path validation error"
Looking at the differences between my application logic and verify.c, I see
that the command line uses an X509
Hi,
I'm trying to parse a DER cert that seems to be invalid. I can parse it but
not load it or convert it into a PEM file. Is there a way to find out what's
wrong with the file?
Thanks in advance!
openssl x509 -inform der -in ..\certs\cert1.crt -out ..\
certs\cert1.pem
unable to load certificat
if there are no security messages in the MVS syslog,
here is one other place i might look:
if the syslogd daemon is running, usually FTPD
(depending on its own config file) will write messages
concerning the connections it permits(or denys) into
a file specified by /etc/syslog.conf. these are usua
SSL on Port 21 usually is Explicit and on 990 Implicit. The difference
between the two being that in Explicit the client gets to decide by sending
the AUTH command when the SSL handshake happens. On Implicit the SSL
handshake happens right after connect. You could use the command line
openssl s_
Hey thanks so much for the reply. Yes, the tcp/ip port definitions are the
same for port 21 as for port 990. Port 21 is working, ftp over ssl/tls ...
Port 990 is defined the same within tcp/ip ... I do make a connection after the
ftp is initiated, then I get dropped perhaps that is in the omv
I am getting a variety of stack traces that may all relate to one
cause. The packages runs fine in many instances but one particular
configuration gives problems:
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
S:Red Hat Enterprise
> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Josue Andrade Gomes
> Sent: Tuesday, 03 November, 2009 07:13
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Dave Thompson
> wrote:
> > I'd bet the traceback is wrong.
>
> Indeed a detailed analysis by the debugger show:
>
> ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet
>
Hi
I use to write data to openssl the follow function
int hb_inetSSLWrite(int com,SSL* pSSL, int timeout, char * msg, int
length, int* iRet)
{
int ret;
int sslerr;
int r;
fd_set fd_r, fd_w;
struct timeval tv;
do
{
ret = SSL_write(pSSL, msg, length);
sslerr = SSL
i may not have a clue;
but here are a couple of things to check.
lots of tcpip profiles run with port reservations.
the ftp server has to be configured to listen on 990 which
is probably is if the connection is sucessful.
but if it is and the mainframe is running RACF(or equivilent)
that defines
> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Lutz Jaenicke
> Sent: Tuesday, 03 November, 2009 14:13
> - Forwarded message from sandeep.kuma...@wipro.com -
> Subject: SSL_write returned SSL_ERROR_SSL
> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 19:25:03 +0530
> Thread-Topic: SSL_write returned SSL_ERROR_
Thanks for the reply Mike.
> dont link static libraries into shared libraries and it isnt a problem
Ya that is true. But, I do want to link the static library to the shared
library.
> pic adds a lot of overhead with x86 due to register pressure
Can you point me to link or something that discusse
Forwarding to openssl-users for public discussion.
Best regards,
Lutz
- Forwarded message from sandeep.kuma...@wipro.com -
Subject: SSL_write returned SSL_ERROR_SSL
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 19:25:03 +0530
Thread-Topic: SSL_write returned SSL_ERROR_SSL
Thread-Index: AcpcjT4Rk9sPCTZ0Q
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 13:45, john blair wrote:
>> dont link static libraries into shared libraries and it isnt a problem
>
> Ya that is true. But, I do want to link the static library to the shared
> library.
linking static libraries into a shared library is wrong. maybe
someone else will help
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009, Paul Suhler wrote:
> Hi, everyone.
>
> I'm trying to enable session caching, but my server doesn't seem to send
> a session ID.
>
OpenSSL supports stateless session resumption which doesn't use session IDs.
Well all apart from the latest snapshots which do include session
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Dave Thompson
wrote:
Thanks for your help.
> I'd bet the traceback is wrong.
Indeed a detailed analysis by the debugger show:
ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet
kernel32!UnhandledExceptionFilter+0x7c0
kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x4a
kernel32!_except_handler3+0x61
ntdll!E
Hi,
I'm currently working on an EAP-TLS exchange.
I have a private key file in this format:
-BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-
Proc-Type: 4,ENCRYPTED
My client certificate is encrypted.
I also have a ca certificate that is not encrypted.
I'd like to find out the openssl command to decrypt the clien
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 21:37, john blair wrote:
> I have built openssl-0.9.8k and am trying to link libcrypto.a statically with
> my project. I think libcrypto.a contains contains non-relocatable functions
> For example, consider the following:
> #include
> void foo(void) {
> DES_encry
17 matches
Mail list logo