Can someone comment on why this fails on windows? I too observed that the
decryption does not result in the original plain text on windows.
-Sandeep
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
> Forwarded to openssl-users for public discussion.
>
> Best regards,
>Lutz
>
> -
Thanks Dave. I figured out how to do this. I first built a static version of
libeay32 and ssleay32 using ms\nt.mak (added /Zi and removed /Wx in CFLAGS).
I then created an empty VS2005 project and added apps\req.c apps\apps.c
apps\app_rand.c to the project (I had to look into req utility, similar
w
Hi Doug,
You'll have to forgive my ignorance. I'm not sure why I'm having
difficulties answering you. I'll try to walk you through what I
observe.
I'm a Windows guy, so don't hold it against me that I use 'type'
instead of 'cat'. I'm also going to use F(p) rather than F(2^m) since
I believe its e
I'm using v1.0.0 Beta 3.
My code is perl xs glue but it looks something like this:
purpose= X509_PURPOSE_MIN - 1;
cert_store = X509_STORE_new();
revokes= crl_stack;
X509_STORE_set_flags(cert_store, 0);
vpm= X509_VERIFY_PARAM_new();
X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags(vpm,X
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009, Adam Rosenstein wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying to use indirect CRLs in my application. I cannot figure out
> how to get the CRL signer's cert to be verified though. I keep getting "CRL
> path validation error"
>
> I do something like this:
>
> cs_ctx = X509_STORE_CTX_new
Hi, I'm trying to use indirect CRLs in my application. I cannot figure out how
to get the CRL signer's cert to be verified though. I keep getting "CRL path
validation error"
I do something like this:
cs_ctx = X509_STORE_CTX_new();
if (!cs_ctx) {
error="malloc error";
- "Jeffrey Walton" wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> > I am trying to figure out where the padding bits
> > are applied?
> > ...
> > The two private keys are described in a different
> > number of bytes. Since the 2nd generated private
> > key is shown in 20 bytes i.e. 160 bits, is it assumed
> > that t
