Hello,
I noticed the announcement of some vulnerabilities in OpenSSL:
CVE-2009-0590, CVE-2009-0591 and CVE-2009-0789.
Solution would be to upgrade to 0.9.8k.
But I'm using the binary distribution of Apache (2.0.63 with OpenSSL 0.9.7m)
and \
there is no newer one available. I don't want to switc
hi,
i'm seeing a browser-specific ssl error that i'm not clear is due to
openssl, mod_ssl, or apache? or my own config ... ?
hoping someone here might spare a look at my info/speculations below & comment.
i've installed
apache2-2.2.11-10.1
apache2-worker-2.2.11-10.1
from openSU
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009, Will Bickford wrote:
> Is there a development plan for TLS v1.1 and v1.2 features to be added?
> Is the majority of time taken up in maintenance for developers who work
> on OpenSSL at the moment?
>
Well speaking personally funded tasks take priority due the need to pay
the
Is there a development plan for TLS v1.1 and v1.2 features to be added?
Is the majority of time taken up in maintenance for developers who work
on OpenSSL at the moment?
--Will
-Original Message-
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org
[mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Got it. Thanks for answering such a naive question to a newbie. :-)
Really appreciate your help.
PMHager wrote:
> William,
>
> have a look at MODP (Modular Exponential DH Groups) referenced in RFC5246:
>
> RFC2409 defines primes for 768 and 1024
William,
have a look at MODP (Modular Exponential DH Groups) referenced in RFC5246:
RFC2409 defines primes for 768 and 1024 bit, and
RFC3526 defines primes for 1536, 2048, and 3072 bit.
(The generator is always 2.)
Peter-Michael
_
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:own
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009, Kuba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would ike to know if OpenSSL support TLS v1.1? I can see the information
> that it supports TLS v1, but I dont know if this means TLS v1.x or only TL
> v1.0?
> Please help me.
TLS v1.0 only at present.
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL proje
Hi guys,
i want in my application to write an EC_KEY (curve: prime256v1) into a PEM
file. I can create the EC_KEY and it looks good, but when i want to output
the EC_KEY in a PEM format, there are too many unwanted signs letters in it.
output:
EC_KEY & PARAMETERS:
Private-Key: (256 bit)
priv:
Hi,
I have built openssl 0.9.8k library on windows 64 bit server 2003 OS. I
am linking my application to these dll's and lib's. But when i run my
app it displays the following errors and exits.
Auto configuration failed
1396:error:02001015:system library:fopen:Is a
directory:.\crypto\bio\b
Broken_Heart (Adeel) wrote:
> Hi all, I had deployed the CA with 365 days, but the certificate
> issue by that were valid for days 500. I want to renew my CA
> certificate, so that the same CA can be used in future instead
> deploying the new one as many of the application have trusted that
> CA,
Hi all,
I had deployed the CA with 365 days, but the certificate issue by that were
valid for days 500.
I want to renew my CA certificate, so that the same CA can be used in future
instead deploying the new one as many of the application have trusted that
CA, so creating new one after the CA get
Hello!
I'd like to create a DER-encoded PKCS7 message with the signedData and
envelopedData chaining.
openssl documentation advises
* Sign and encrypt mail: *
* openssl smime -sign -in ml.txt -signer my.pem -text \
| openssl smime -encrypt -out mail.msg \
-from st...@openssl.org
Hi,
I would ike to know if OpenSSL support TLS v1.1? I can see the information that
it supports TLS v1, but I dont know if this means TLS v1.x or only TL v1.0?
Please help me.
Best wishes,
Kuba PL
13 matches
Mail list logo
