Dear All,
my problem can't still be sloved.
abc_123_ok
2008-07-30
发件人： abc_123_ok
发送时间： 2008-07-29 14:52:06
收件人： openssl-users@openssl.org
抄送：
主题： Re: Re: Re: hello everyone
Dear Ger Hobbelt and All,
I should introduce a situation to you.
I use openssl server and client to test with
Dear Ger Hobbelt,
yes , you are correct , my client does not use Openssl code.
abc_123_ok
2008-07-30
发件人： Ger Hobbelt
发送时间： 2008-07-28 18:10:31
收件人： openssl-users@openssl.org
抄送：
主题： Re: Re: Re: hello everyone
> I use openssl as a server to test SSL client of our comany. the SSL client
Hello,
I´m trying to compile openssl-snap-20080729 under MinGW/MSYS environment
but I have problems with some defines from wincrypt.h. I saw that in past
[1] you get similar problems but for now the ¨undef¨ fix seems no sense to
me.
OBS: I´m using ActivePerl for symlink compatibility, when using
SSL_get_error() returns 1 and ERR_error_string( ERR_get_error() )
returns "error::lib(0):func(0):reason(0)".
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List
I'm curious: what does SSL_get_last_error give? What stack does
ERR_get_error give?
-Kyle H
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Alen Puzic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are using dynamic linking - using dlopen to open the shared objects
> and then load the function symbols we are using. All the
We are using dynamic linking - using dlopen to open the shared objects
and then load the function symbols we are using. All the symbols load
correctly and I haven't seen any function calls causing any crashes
yet. I just get an SSL_connect() error on the client end which results
in error SSL_ERROR_
O.K. That's what I expected. Thanks !
Cheers,
Phibo
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:47:02 +0200
"Dr. Stephen Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008, Phibo wrote:
>
> >
> > Is it possible for a certificate authority (CA) signing my SSL certificate
> > signing request (csr) to decrypt
I know that s isn't null because I check its value before I call
SSL_get_peer_certificate(). I've also verified that s->session is infact NULL
before the call to SSL_get_peer_certificate().
I can still send data across the link - I've tested using BIO_read() and
BIO_write() to see if the machi
Hi Sachin:
On July 29, 2008 09:53:47 am Sachin Puttur wrote:
> Hi,
> The Self signed Certificate is created in Windows server 2008 as given
> below.We have created the certificate file hpcpb.cer.
>
> Then we will follow below steps in linux machine .
>
> 1) openssl x509 -in test.cer -i
Hi,
The Self signed Certificate is created in Windows server 2008 as given
below.We have created the certificate file hpcpb.cer.
Then we will follow below steps in linux machine .
1) openssl x509 -in test.cer -inform d -out hpcbp.pem
2) cp hpcbp.pem /usr/share/ssl/certs/
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 09:39:04AM -0400, Kenneth Goldman wrote:
> In my experience, openssl releases routinely break compatibility.
> This occurs for letter as well as number changes.
>
> Compiling against the new version is not enough. You must
> link with the same version. Dynamic linking of
The only way (other than brute force or perhaps some highly-classified,
non public attack on the RSA algorithm) for a man-in-the-middle to
compromise an SSL session without notifying the client is for the MITM
to either:
Have the private key of one of the two parties.
Be considered a trusted CA by
Dr. Stephen Henson escribió:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008, Phibo wrote:
Is it possible for a certificate authority (CA) signing my SSL certificate
signing request (csr) to decrypt my own SSL sessions ? Or, in other words,
in a csr are there enough infos about my private key to be able to intercept
S
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008, Phibo wrote:
>
> Is it possible for a certificate authority (CA) signing my SSL certificate
> signing request (csr) to decrypt my own SSL sessions ? Or, in other words,
> in a csr are there enough infos about my private key to be able to intercept
> SSL sessions encrypted by
In my experience, openssl releases routinely break compatibility.
This occurs for letter as well as number changes.
Compiling against the new version is not enough. You must
link with the same version. Dynamic linking offers a
third possibility for inconsistency.
The symptom I typically see is
15 matches
Mail list logo
