Hi
What shall be the implementation of function RAND_Poll on VxWorks. It is an
empty function in my code just returning success.
In the UNIX flavour the same sets the entropy. On VxWorks, the entropy is not
set this being empty function which results into ssl_connect failure.
Regards
Anurad
What version of gcc?
Ted
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Yuliya Shulman
> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 6:51 AM
> To: openssl-users@openssl.org
> Subject: RE: Prime number generation on FreeBSD-sparc64
>
>
> I sent this before a few ea
just in case it helps debugging, when you said the first 8 bytes are wrong,
instead of trying a pattern like "111" to send over you might try
something like "12345..." so that way you can tell WHERE your data is
getting messed up - ie that could show that not only is the first 8 bytes
wrong, bu
Does the client receive the data properly?
Does the server receive the data properly?
You may have padding going on, you may have an initialization vector
being preset, you may have a whole bunch of things going on under the
hood. As long as both the client and the server agree on what's going
on
Dear All，
who can give me some advice about below problem。
Thanks
Best Regards.
发件人： abc_123_ok
发送时间： 2008-07-22 17:53:34
收件人： openssl-users
抄送：
主题： hello everyone
Dear All，
I use openssl as a server to test SSL client of our comany. the SSL client is
a part of embedded system。
I used comm
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008, Christopher Ivory wrote:
>I see what you mean, however, when I get the processor info with the command
>"uname -a" it returns:
>
> SunOS t5200tx 5.10 Generic_120011-14 sun4v sparc
>SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise-T5220
>
>I was working under the impression that this is a T2. Was I mis
If it helps, I ran the cryptoadm and got the following results:
User-level providers:
=
Provider: /usr/lib/security/$ISA/pkcs11_kernel.so
Mechanisms:
CKM_DES_CBC
CKM_DES_ECB
CKM_DES3_CBC
CKM_DES3_ECB
CKM_AES_CBC
CKM_AES_ECB
CKM_RC4
Mechanisms:
CKM_DSA
CKM_RSA_X_509
CKM_RSA_PKC
I see what you mean, however, when I get the processor info with the command
"uname -a" it returns:
SunOS t5200tx 5.10 Generic_120011-14 sun4v sparc
SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise-T5220
I was working under the impression that this is a T2. Was I misinformed?
-Chris
PS - Thanks for your conitnued help
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008, Jan Pechanec wrote:
> in OpenSolaris, there is a project that mechanisms that are not
>implemented in hw will stay in the soft token.
of course, I meant "will stay in OpenSSL"
--
Jan Pechanec
___
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008, Christopher Ivory wrote:
>When I ran the same test with the pkcs chip initialized ("speed sha1 -engine
>pkcs11") the results were:
>
> The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
> type 16 bytes 64 bytes256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192
>b
I am getting this error when I try to use some ruby OepnSSL libraries
to obtain the private key from my private key PEM file.
I have tried this on the SSL credentials I got for my web-site from
GoDaddy.com - The site works fine and credentials are recognized in IE
and FF.
I tried generating my ow
I think I figured out my problem but I'd like someone to confirm for me that
this seems like a reasonable conclusion. I've been wondering whether or not
I had properly initiated the PKCS11 chip for OpenSSL because I wasn't seeing
much improvement in processing time. I'm trying to sign using the fol
I'm afraid I don't quite follow.
I'm compiling my code with the command lines below:
gcc -Wall -ggdb -DDEBUG LoadDataFromFile.c -c LoadDataFromFile.o
gcc -Wall -ggdb -DDEBUG WriteDataToFile.c -c WriteDataToFile.o
gcc -Wall -ggdb -DDEBUG sign.c -c sign.o
gcc -I /usr/sfw/include -L /usr/
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008, Christopher Ivory wrote:
>Jan,
>
>Thanks for the information! How can I explicitly initialize the PKCS11
>engine when writing in C? I've looked at examples, but I think I'm missing a
>step because when I verify or sign using OpenSSL, I'm seeing no improvement
>in performance.
Jan,
Thanks for the information! How can I explicitly initialize the PKCS11
engine when writing in C? I've looked at examples, but I think I'm missing a
step because when I verify or sign using OpenSSL, I'm seeing no improvement
in performance.
-Chris
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Jan Pechane
Hi,
I am new to openssl. I am trying to cross compiling openssl-0.9.8g for
linux mipsel.
I gave the following command to configure
./Configure shared no-idea no-rc5 --prefix=path to file system
linux-mipsel.
When I compile by Make command.
I am getting the error
_dl_out_of_memory @GLIBCversio
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008, sadronmeldir wrote:
>I'm aware that the default installation of the Solaris 10 OS provides a
>PKCS#11-based OpenSSL implementation. I'm trying to take some metrics to
>figure out how much more efficient certain processes are with the PKCS
>engine. How would I disable the PKCS
Hello all,
I'm aware that the default installation of the Solaris 10 OS provides a
PKCS#11-based OpenSSL implementation. I'm trying to take some metrics to
figure out how much more efficient certain processes are with the PKCS
engine. How would I disable the PKCS engine on an UltraSPARC T1 proces
Dear All，
I use openssl as a server to test SSL client of our comany. the SSL client is
a part of embedded system。
I used command as blow in Cygwin.
openssl s_server -accept 443 -cert testserver.pem -CAfile spectra_ca.pem
-cipher DES-CBC3-SHA
Loading 'screen' into random state - done
Using d
19 matches
Mail list logo
