Re: X509_STORE & STACK OF(X509)

2008-04-04 Thread Victor B. Wagner
On 2008.04.04 at 15:53:33 +0200, roberto calosino wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to know the difference between X509_STORE (X509_STORE_new) and > STACK_OF(X509) (sk_X509_new). > What kind of additional information contains a X509_STORE ? Stack is generic data structure. There are stacks of every

Re: win32 openssl w/o requiring the dreaded msvcr71.dll?

2008-04-04 Thread Victor B. Wagner
On 2008.03.27 at 14:52:19 -0400, Bobby Krupczak wrote: > Hi! > > I'm trying to build a multi-platform application using openssl. I'm > using the win32 ssl libs built by Shining Path. However, those libs > require msvcr71.dll whilst the rest of my apps are compiled such that > they only require

X509_STORE & STACK OF(X509)

2008-04-04 Thread roberto calosino
Hello, I'd like to know the difference between X509_STORE (X509_STORE_new) and STACK_OF(X509) (sk_X509_new). What kind of additional information contains a X509_STORE ? Thank you very much in advance. _ Unbegrenzter Speicherplat

X509_STORE & STACK OF(X509)

2008-04-04 Thread roberto calosino
Hello, I'd like to know the difference between X509_STORE (X509_STORE_new) and STACK_OF(X509) (sk_X509_new). What kind of additional information contains a X509_STORE ? Thank you very much in advance. _ Mit der Gruppen-SMS v

Re: openssl performance

2008-04-04 Thread Badra
Hi raj, Try openssl speed Best regards, On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 5:48 AM, raj H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks Jimmy! This command looks to help me for the performance! Only > thing is I have to get it working. I keep on getting errors. > Anyways, thanks! I will go through and get it runnin

question on creating SMIME message

2008-04-04 Thread Li, Serena
Hi, I'm currently using OpenSSL to generate SMIME message, but the message doesn't seem to conform to MIME specification (http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1521.html). According to MIME specification section 7.2.1, it says that the encapsulation boundary must be preceded with one CRLF and follow

Re: openssl performance

2008-04-04 Thread Jeremy Hunt
try typing openssl s_time ? raj H wrote: *[safeTgram (optim1) receive status: NOT encrypted, NOT signed.]* Thanks Jimmy! This command looks to help me for the performance! Only thing is I have to get it working. I keep on getting errors. Anyways, thanks! I will go through and get it running

Re: - client Apache/2.2.3 --> FAILED (tls_read: want=11, got=0 TLS: can't accept.)

2008-04-04 Thread fgb62
we have forget apache config file: .htaccess AuthType Basic AuthBasicProvider ldap AuthName "LDAP XX 3" AuthzLDAPAuthoritative off AuthLDAPURL "ldaps://servidor/ou=ClaseA,ou=People,dc=MYDOMAIN,dc=COM" AuthLDAPBindDN "cn=Manager,dc=X,dc=COM" AuthLDAPBindPassword "[BLANK]"

- client Apache/2.2.3 --> FAILED (tls_read: want=11, got=0 TLS: can't accept.)

2008-04-04 Thread fgb62
Good morning We are trying to setup apache vs ldaps We have the next situation: server openldap with: - client ldapsearch --> OK - client openssl s_client --> OK - client Apache/2.2.4 (Ubuntu) (another machine) --> OK - client Apache/2.2.3 --> FAILED (tls_read: want=11, got=0 TLS: can't ac