David Schwartz wrote:
David Schwartz wrote:
Which part of "For other sockets, readability means that queued data
is
available for reading such that a call to recv, WSARecv,
WSARecvFrom, or
recvfrom is _guaranteed not to block_." do you not understand?
It means a hypothetical concurrent call
> David Schwartz wrote:
> >> Which part of "For other sockets, readability means that queued data
> >> is
> >> available for reading such that a call to recv, WSARecv,
> >> WSARecvFrom, or
> >> recvfrom is _guaranteed not to block_." do you not understand?
> > It means a hypothetical concurrent
David Schwartz wrote:
Which part of "For other sockets, readability means that queued data is
available for reading such that a call to recv, WSARecv, WSARecvFrom, or
recvfrom is _guaranteed not to block_." do you not understand?
It means a hypothetical concurrent call, not a future actual call
> Which part of "For other sockets, readability means that queued data is
> available for reading such that a call to recv, WSARecv, WSARecvFrom, or
> recvfrom is _guaranteed not to block_." do you not understand?
It means a hypothetical concurrent call, not a future actual call.
There is simply
David Schwartz wrote:
MSDN Library documents select() as being exactly as I describe:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms740141.aspx
(See the description of when readfds returns).
So now that the matter you describe has been cleared up, answer the
question.
You misunderstand the docu
> MSDN Library documents select() as being exactly as I describe:
>
> http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms740141.aspx
>
> (See the description of when readfds returns).
>
> So now that the matter you describe has been cleared up, answer the
> question.
You misunderstand the documentation.
David Schwartz wrote:
What I want to know is how do I tell OpenSSL that it is okay to do some
processing of socket data but not block even with blocking sockets?
You are asking for the impossible. There is no way to be sure a socket
operation will not block other than to set the socket non-bloc
> What I want to know is how do I tell OpenSSL that it is okay to do some
> processing of socket data but not block even with blocking sockets?
You are asking for the impossible. There is no way to be sure a socket
operation will not block other than to set the socket non-blocking. Much
code has
Here's what I want to do:
select() on the underlying socket.
IF select() says data is available to be read,
let OpenSSL "manage processing that data but not block even if the
socket is blocking".
Check to see if SSL_read() will succeed instantly by calling SSL_pending().
IF SSL_pending() retu
Suchindra Chandrahas wrote:
> Thanks a lot Marek!
>
> I was making mistake at:
>
> 16 - SSL3/TLS1 handshake packet (was not including this)
>
> Now i understood the whole process completely, thanks to your guidance!.
> If there is any document or any such thing that has such details,
> it woul
Thanks a lot Marek!
I was making mistake at:
16 - SSL3/TLS1 handshake packet (was not including this)
Now i understood the whole process completely, thanks to your guidance!. If
there is any document or any such thing that has such details, it would be
great if you could forward it to me. Tha
Hello,
> Documentation says that, for EVP_EncryptUpdate, buffer of length (input
> length + cipher block size - 1) should be passed to output parameter.
>
> Suppose if we take AES-128, if the input length is 33, output written by
> EVP_EncryptUpdate will be 32. So, possible size could be
> ((in
Hi.
Does anybody have an example of parsing an X509 certificate structure to
pull out the UserPrincipalName from the Subject Alternative Name
attribute? If I understand correctly I would need to make some calls to
V3_alt.c (???). I could use some assistance on how to make the
necessary calls to
Hi all,
Documentation says that, for EVP_EncryptUpdate, buffer of length (input length
+ cipher block size - 1) should be passed to output parameter.
Suppose if we take AES-128, if the input length is 33, output written by
EVP_EncryptUpdate will be 32. So, possible size could be
((input_length
> There is no need for the data buffer to stay constant between calls to
> SSL_write.
>
> Arne
Did you see my post proving that this must be false? Here's the scenario
again:
1) You try to write 16 bytes on a non-blocking SSL connection.
2) This results in a 24 byte record after encryption.
3)
I will be out of the office starting 24/08/2007 and will not return until
01/09/2007.
I will respond to your message when I return.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing
I ran the following test on my Radhat (Fodora 6) server to test eap-tls
(after I started radiusd):
./eapol_test -c ../network -a 127.0.0.1 -p1812 -s secret -r 1
It failed after some handshake with the server:
...
EAP: EAP entering state RECEIVED
EAP: Received EAP-Request id=3
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007, Bynum, Don wrote:
> So, when I see a Friendly Name in the CA certs in a Trusted Root Store
> (in any browser for example), how did the friendly name get there? A
> PKCS#12 file always includes the private key, right? The private keys
> of Trusted Root CA certs are certainl
So, when I see a Friendly Name in the CA certs in a Trusted Root Store
(in any browser for example), how did the friendly name get there? A
PKCS#12 file always includes the private key, right? The private keys
of Trusted Root CA certs are certainly not submitted to the browser
vendor.
Regards,
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007, Bynum, Don wrote:
> I want to embed a friendly name in a self signed Root CA cert. I cannot
> seem to find the correct element in the config file to set this. Anyone
> know how to do this?
There isn't a DN component or extension called "friendly name". It is only an
attrib
I forgot to mention. 0.9.8e.
G.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shaw Graham George
Sent: 24 August 2007 13:40
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Problem building Windows 64-bit
Hi,
I've tried to follow the instructions in INSTALL
I want to embed a friendly name in a self signed Root CA cert. I cannot
seem to find the correct element in the config file to set this. Anyone
know how to do this?
Don Bynum
Hi,
I've tried to follow the instructions in INSTALL.W64 for building
OpenSSL for 64-bit Windows, but while C programs are compiling OK, the
link of the dlls is failing:
link /nologo /subsystem:console /opt:ref /dll /out:out32dll\libeay32.dll
/def:ms/LIBEAY32.def @"C:\Documents and Settings\gshaw
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 01:33:17PM +0300, Arne Ansper wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Darryl Miles wrote:
>> Bodo Moeller wrote:
>>> When using SSL_write() over a non-blocking transport channel, you may
>>> have to call SSL_write() multiple times until all your data has been
>>> transferred. In thi
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Darryl Miles wrote:
Bodo Moeller wrote:
When using SSL_write() over a non-blocking transport channel, you may
have to call SSL_write() multiple times until all your data has been
transferred. In this case, the data buffer needs to stay constant
between calls until SSL_
25 matches
Mail list logo
