Re: How to verify a certificate against several others

Hello Florian, --On Freitag, Juli 06, 2007 09:14:41 +0200 Florian MANACH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: OK I see but It's always not working after c_rehash ./root c_rehash ./certs c_rehash ./crls Oups: --On Donnerstag, Juli 05, 2007 14:55:59 +0200 Florian MANACH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: Question: ASCII Armored text signature

On 7/6/07, Darryl Miles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So if you actually read the Wikipedia page (a previous poster has kindly pointed you at) you should end up at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2440#section-6 Darryl Thanks all! I got everything working now. :-) -- - Jeremiah Martell http://i

Re: Question: ASCII Armored text signature

So if you actually read the Wikipedia page (a previous poster has kindly pointed you at) you should end up at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2440#section-6 Darryl Jeremiah Martell wrote: On 7/5/07, Carlo Milono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Radix-64 - if you want the PGP/GPG stuff. See: http

SSL_connect blocks for almost 1 minute

I'm working on a C++ client application that uses OpenSSL to secure the communication with a server. I got some pretty weird error when deploying on a client's machine. From their feedback and from the logs it appears that SSL_connect always blocks for about 40 seconds while hogging the CPU ( i

RE: Question: ASCII Armored text signature

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-openssl- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremiah Martell > Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 6:03 AM > To: openssl-users@openssl.org > Subject: Re: Question: ASCII Armored text signature > > On 7/5/07, Carlo Milono <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Question: ASCII Armored text signature

On 7/5/07, Carlo Milono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Radix-64 - if you want the PGP/GPG stuff. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_to_text_encoding Ok, Here's a real example from using GPG on my MAC: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This is an example sentence I will sign. -

Re: EC

Hello, > > I am trying the below commands what is going wrong, > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] crypt]$ openssl ecparam -outform DER -out ec-key.pem > -name secp224r1 -genkey > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] crypt]$ openssl ec -inform DER -in ec-key.der -text > -noout > > read EC key > > unable to load Key >

EC 224bits

Hi All, Is there any crypto function similar to the below one, int AES_set_encrypt_key(const unsigned char *userKey, const int bits, AES_KEY *key); for EC, int EC_set_private_key(const unsigned char *userKey, const int bits, EC_KEY *key); int EC_set_public_key(const unsigned char *userKe

RE: EC

That's a typo error [EMAIL PROTECTED] crypt]$ openssl ecparam -outform DER -out ec-key.der -name secp224r1 -genkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] crypt]$ openssl ec -inform DER -in ec-key.der -text -noout read EC key unable to load Key 19387:error:0D0680A8:asn1 encoding routines:ASN1_CHECK_TLEN:wrong tag:tasn

Re: EC

Here is the part that seems to be wrong -outform DER -out ec-key.pem -inform DER -in ec-key.der Try with the same filename in both commands. -- Florian Manach NUMLOG [EMAIL PROTECTED] (+33)0130791616 C K KIRAN-KNTX36 a écrit : Hi All, I am trying the below commands what is going wrong, [

EC

Hi All, I am trying the below commands what is going wrong, [EMAIL PROTECTED] crypt]$ openssl ecparam -outform DER -out ec-key.pem -name secp224r1 -genkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] crypt]$ openssl ec -inform DER -in ec-key.der -text -noout read EC key unable to load Key 19331:error:0D0680A8:asn1

Encryption using public key

Hello! I need to build a library using openssl, which allowes encryption, decryption and digital signing. I have publi key, which I read from cetrificate, a and I don't know how should I use teh key in encryption. I'm a beginner, could anybody help me? Anetka --

Re: How to verify a certificate against several others

OK I see but It's always not working after c_rehash ./root c_rehash ./certs c_rehash ./crls -- Florian Manach NUMLOG [EMAIL PROTECTED] (+33)0130791616 Goetz Babin-Ebell a écrit : Hello Florian, --On Donnerstag, Juli 05, 2007 17:59:01 +0200 Florian MANACH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: No, I di