On 8/28/06, Milan Tomic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
While atempting to establish SSL connection I got this OpenSSL error:
Certificate Verification: Error (20): unable to get local issuer
certificate
[...]
One of the possible reasons for this error is that the server cert is
signed by an inter
Hi
I am not sure about the kind of cert u are having problem with. Is
this some standard cert of some site (than pass on the URL) or if some
internal site, than please check that complete chain is present in the
IE CA list. Also, the CA cert should be installed in the Trusted root
certs lists in
Thanks for all the reponse,
i have a question about this following method
int X509_STORE_CTX_init(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx, X509_STORE *store,
X509 *x509, STACK_OF(X509) *chain);
if i understand this correctly the argument 'x509' is the cert that u want
to be verified & the
Nils,
The basic succession of calls are as
follows. I think the program waits for an ssl_read or ssl_write to implicitly
trigger the handshake process.
meth = TLSv1_client_method()
SSL_load_error_strings();
SSLeay_add_ssl_algorithms();
SSL_CTX_new(meth);
ssl = SSL_new( ctx );
sbio = BIO_new_s
I am trying to use SMIME_read_PKCS7 to read a signed and encrypted MIME
message from memory BIO, but I can't get it to work. It works fine if I
construct a file BIO to read from. Am I doing something wrong, or is
this a bug?
See the test application below that shows the problem. Please note that
y
Ryan Shon wrote:
>
> I work for nFocal, a company in
> Rochester, New York. We want to develop a variant of OpenSSL
> in which we optimize the cryptography library to run on
> a particular DSP. The other components of OpenSSL would remain
> unchanged except where needed to utilize our custom lib
> What is actually going on when the end-user runs OpenSSL and it
> dynamically links in your restricted library, or the end user compiles
> the unrestricted OpenSSL into your restricted library, is that they
> are committing a license violation of the OpenSSL license when
> they start using the r
Hello,
> >Do you have libssl library dependency like:
> > $ ldd libssl.so.0.9.8
> >libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => ./libcrypto.so.0.9.8
> >libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/hpux32/libdl.so.1
> >in your build directory.
>
> Are you suggesting looking into the Makefile? Well ... I can
> see that building a
Original message
>Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:02:32 +0200
>From: Marek Marcola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Build problem on HP Itanium 64 bit machine
>To: openssl-users@openssl.org
>
>Hello,
>>
>> I am having problem building openssl on HP Itanium 64 bit box.
>> Attached are th
Original message
>Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 20:05:51 +0200
>From: Leif Thuresson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Build problem on HP Itanium 64 bit machine
>To: openssl-users@openssl.org
>
>Hi,
>I have also had problems building shared version of
openssl-0.9.8b
> on hpux-11.00 parisc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nils,
Yes. I read the entire e-mail. I can't find ANYWHERE where it's being
fed to the application, (including the source code). As far as I can
see, it's definitely not being used in an ssl_ library call nor is he
which ssl api calls are used to initialize the ssl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent, excellent idea. Is ssldump an API call?
it's an application to analyze a ssl connection
(see http://www.rtfm.com/ssldump/ )
Cheers,
Nils
__
OpenSSL Project
Hi,
I have also had problems building shared version of openssl-0.9.8b
on hpux-11.00 parisc using the hp ansi-c compiler.
It looks like the openssl shared-library building part is completely
re-implemented in 0.9.8 (compared to 0.9.7 which worked out of the box)
In 0.9.7 shared libraries where lin
On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 13:52 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Excellent, excellent idea. Is ssldump an API call? If so, I haven't
> seen that. Let me go out to the site and look. I wish there were a
> more organized and informative source for information on the openssl
> API.
This is very usef
Excellent, excellent idea. Is ssldump
an API call? If so, I haven't seen that. Let me go out to the site
and look. I wish there were a more organized and informative source for
information on the openssl API.
That should definitely make the problem
expose itself. Thanks!
Marek Marcola <[EMA
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, David Schwartz wrote:
Certainly. Nothing in the OpenSSL licenses requires you to allow
redistribution of any derivative works you create.
Wrong. See the following:
"...The licence and distribution terms for any publically
available version
or
derivative of this code
Hello,
>
> I am having problem building openssl on HP Itanium 64 bit box.
> Attached are the files that show the output of Configure and make. The
> output of make is stripped to show the last section where error is
> reported.
>
> The error is
> ld: Unknown input file type: "./libcrypto.so"
>
Hi everyone,
I am having problem building openssl on HP
Itanium 64 bit box.
Attached are the files that show the output of
Configure and make. The output of make is stripped to show the last section
where error is reported.
The error is
ld: Unknown input
file type: "./libcrypto.so"Fatal err
Hi All,
Can anyone tell me if the behavior of the BIO_new_accept, BIO_do_accept,
and BIO_read functions changes in any way while using DTLS?
Thanks,
Jeremy
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.opens
19 matches
Mail list logo