> > The same problem occurs with one thread. Consider the
> > following code,
> > assume blocking sockets:
> > 1) do some stuff
> > 2) do a huge write, don't check for short writes since our socket is
> > blocking
> That code is broken. Fix it. You must _always_ check for short
> writes. Not
--On Wednesday, June 21, 2006 3:36 PM -0700 David Schwartz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The same problem occurs with one thread. Consider the following code,
assume blocking sockets:
1) do some stuff
2) do a huge write, don't check for short writes since our socket is
blocking
That cod
> David,
> Please post a link to a manpage or other documentation that
> justifies your
> description of select.
I posted a link to the SuSv2 description of 'select'. There is no
guarantee
there that a future operation will not block.
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xsh/sel
> David Schwartz wrote:
> > No. That you cannot think of a way does not mean that no way exists.
>
> WTF ! Is dark the absence of light, or is light the absence of dark ?
> Please prove your way exists, there are enough poll/select
> implementations available to inspect. Your words have n
> David you are bringing completely unrelated issues into the situation.
No, you are failing to understand my argument.
> David Schwartz wrote:
> ...SNIP...
> > One other point, I didn't mention threads to argue that if
> another thread
> > steals your data, the operation will clearl
I heard 'very soon now' :)
Tinnerello, Richard wrote:
Can anyone say when the openssl-fips-1.1.tar.gz distribution announced
on Saturday will be available for download? Thanks!
Richard
__
OpenSSL Project
Can anyone say when the openssl-fips-1.1.tar.gz
distribution announced on Saturday will be available for download?
Thanks!
Richard
Is your OS 8 or 9? Why not just get a package version from sunfreeware?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alex Bartonek
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 3:54 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: openssl 0.9.8 install issue?
yes I ran
yes I ran configure and yes the prerequisites are
met...
what does the readme say..alot of stuff from a
descripton of openssl, small overview about libssl.a,
libcrypto... then about a young Tim Hudson and Eric
Young how they fought off the cold weather and braved
the harsh conditions in the Saha
yes.. I did a ldd svn ..seems as though I do not have
the library..
--- Marek Marcola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> > installing libcrypto.a
> > installing libssl.a
> > cp libcrypto.pc /usr/local/ssl/lib/pkgconfig
> > chmod 644
> /usr/local/ssl/lib/pkgconfig/libcrypto.pc
> > cp libssl.pc
Hello,
> installing libcrypto.a
> installing libssl.a
> cp libcrypto.pc /usr/local/ssl/lib/pkgconfig
> chmod 644 /usr/local/ssl/lib/pkgconfig/libcrypto.pc
> cp libssl.pc /usr/local/ssl/lib/pkgconfig
> chmod 644 /usr/local/ssl/lib/pkgconfig/libssl.pc
> cp openssl.pc /usr/local/ssl/lib/pkgconfig
> ch
So your issue is not after the package is installed... it's during the
make/install phase. Did you run a configure prior to running make? What does
the README files state? Are the pre-req packages installed eg. gcc3.2 and
libiconv?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[
no the export does not help...
Here is the output of 'make':
making all in crypto...
making all in crypto/objects...
making all in crypto/md2...
making all in crypto/md4...
making all in crypto/md5...
making all in crypto/sha...
making all in crypto/hmac...
making all in crypto/ripemd...
making a
Try adding:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/usr/lib/ssl; export LD_LIBRARY_PATH
to see if that helps.
Also, does the library actually exist?
Questions:
Did the compile work?
Did the "make install" work?
Did you see where the file was installed?
-Original Message-
From
no..I dont have a env variable as LD_LIBRARY_PATH
setup currently.. also, /usr/lib/ssl/lib does not
exist. (/usr/lib/ssl does though).
-alex
--- "Scott, James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you update your LD_LIBRARY_PATH to include
> /usr/local/ssl/lib?
>
> -Original Message-
> From
Did you update your LD_LIBRARY_PATH to include /usr/local/ssl/lib?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alex Bartonek
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 1:36 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: openssl 0.9.8 install issue?
I'm running Solaris 5
I'm running Solaris 5.9 and did the basic install
commands w/ openssl 0.9.8..
make
make install
when I run svn (subversion) I get the following error:
ld.so.1: svn: fatal: libssl.so.0.9.8: open failed: No
such file or directory
Killed
i'm stumped as to what I did wrong..did I miss a step
somewh
Hello,
I have the following code nothing fancy just opening a pkcs12 file and
then trying to free every thing. when I run the code though purify I
get an error on sk_X509_pop_free, Freeing unallocated memeory, Freeing
memory read. If I don't uses sk_X509_free I get a memory leek but I
don't
jimmy wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to write an http server which supports virtual servers &
ssl sessions. If I were to support the TLS 1.0 server name extension
(which says different virtual servers cud send different
certificates), then would I be able to use the same SSL_CTX across the
different
David,
Please post a link to a manpage or other documentation that justifies your
description of select.
Your stat analogy is incomplete; stat returns the true file size, in the
absence of other external factors, such as another process (or thread)
doing something. Select makes the same guaran
Hello,
I am trying to work a full SSL shutdown (close notify sent and received
before closing the socket).
The situation:
* Am currently in established / active SSL state, with a working
connection.
* No shutdown notify has been received and we are being to instigate
the shutdown notify.
Hello,
>
> People thought that if they got a read hit on a listening socket, they
> could then call accept without blocking. Oops, if the connection terminated
> before they called accept, they blocked. They couldn't think of a way, but
> they were not *guaranteed* there was no way.
Thing ar
David Schwartz wrote:
No. That you cannot think of a way does not mean that no way exists.
WTF ! Is dark the absence of light, or is light the absence of dark ?
Please prove your way exists, there are enough poll/select
implementations available to inspect. Your words have no weigh
David you are bringing completely unrelated issues into the situation.
David Schwartz wrote:
...SNIP...
One other point, I didn't mention threads to argue that if another
thread
steals your data, the operation will clearly block. I mentioned it to show
that it's impossible for 'select
24 matches
Mail list logo