On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Christopher Fowler wrote:
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 17:31, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Once more, very fuzzy. If your code is a loader then how am I gonna load
my stuff into your device without it? All I have to do is take the
firmware
image for your device, separate out your loa
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 17:31, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> Once more, very fuzzy. If your code is a loader then how am I gonna load
> my stuff into your device without it? All I have to do is take the
> firmware
> image for your device, separate out your loader, replace the GPL with
> my own GPL, and
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 11 Apr 2006 14:51:58 -0700, Tyler
MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
tyler> However, the descussion about how OpenSSL should interact with
tyler> GPL software has been quite valuable.
Yes, I entirely agree with you on that.
Cheers,
Richard
-
Please
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, boys and girls, however much I actually enjoy discussing the
> intricaties of licenses out the wazoo, I don't think a discussion on
> how to interpret the GPL belongs in this list. Let's move along,
> shall we?
+1... However,
OK, boys and girls, however much I actually enjoy discussing the
intricaties of licenses out the wazoo, I don't think a discussion on
how to interpret the GPL belongs in this list. Let's move along,
shall we?
Cheers,
Richard
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Christopher Fowler
>Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 5:23 AM
>To: openssl-users@openssl.org
>Subject: Re: Licenses...
>
>
>On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 08:07 -0400, Wes Kussmaul wrote:
>> Are you suggesting that if yo
The following appears in the FIPS 140-2 Validation
presentation from Linux World Expo.
(oss-institute.org/OpenSSL/LWE_040406_BOF.pdf)
Page 23: FIPS mode requirements:
* The application must use only OpenSSL for all
cryptography.
Where can I find this in the security policy?
Are
Forwarded to openssl-users
Regards,
Lutz
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 16:51:54 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: BUG REPORT
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: opens
I will be out of the office starting 04/11/2006 and will not return until
04/12/2006.
I will be out of the office on Tuesday April 11, 2006. I will respond to
your email when I return on Wednesday April 12, 2006. If this is a
production issue, please call our 24/7 NSS/OCC number at 1 800 555 99
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006, Holger Menzer wrote:
Hello,
is it possible to implement indirect Certificate Revocation Lists with
OpenSSL?
There is an entry in the man page to x509v3_config [1], saying it cannot
currently be set or displayed... But maybe someone hacked it an
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 08:07 -0400, Wes Kussmaul wrote:
> Are you suggesting that if you embed software in a hardware product,
> it's no longer software?
>
> The GPL most certainly applies to embedded versions of software
> products
> which it licenses.
>
> If that were not true then I would be
David Schwartz wrote:
Take for example the ActionTec DSL modem, this is sold by ActionTec and
runs embedded Linux... Yet you cannot obtain the modified GNU code from the
ActionTec website
as required by GPL... or thttpd, but not the modified bootloader code or the
black box
interface itself, s
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tyler MacDonald
>Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 7:43 PM
>To: openssl-users@openssl.org
>Subject: Re: Licenses...
>
>
> And as a result, OpenSSL will be used by even more pieces of
>software and OpenSSL w
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Schwartz
>Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 4:41 PM
>To: openssl-users@openssl.org
>Subject: RE: Licenses...
>
>
>
>> Take for example the ActionTec DSL modem, this is sold by
>ActionTec and
>> runs embedde
14 matches
Mail list logo
