0.9.7h is FIPS certified, as long as you build with unmodified sources
(and this is checked with an SHA check on the sources in question).
Or at least, that's what I believe to be the case, given the
documentation on the Security Policy for it.
-Kyle H
On 1/29/06, prakash babu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello All, I came to know that OpenSSL is in its final stage of getting FIPS certification. http://trends.newsforge.com/trends/06/01/23/0429219.shtml Congrats to all the developers and contributors from the OpenSource community for making this happen. I have a couple of question in this
On 1/29/06, dmdm (sent by Nabble.com) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thanks for your post
>
> a few questions if thats ok
>
> I have lokked in the this url
>
> http://www.openssl.org/source/tar ball(this is not a
> rpm so I think I was correct in not geting the tar ball
>
> http://www.fedoralegac
rpm --upgrade --force newfile.rpm
The RPM database will force the installation in this case.
On 1/29/06, dmdm (sent by Nabble.com) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> just a small thought when I get to the stage of installing new rpm (I assume
> this has to be done?)
> then what happens to openssl rpm a
You don't have the C compiler or developer tools installed. Install
those, and 'make' will be installed, along with gcc.
-Kyle H
On 1/29/06, kadir iscmng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi ..
>
> I m using Cygwin , While installing mod_ssl I got the following error ..
>
> "
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTE
Hello,
I have sent the lib files
to OpenSSLGRT. Although the libraries,
applications and libs can be built from the code that can be downloaded, tomorrow
I will include a link in the page for both headers and libs.
B.R.
Daniel Díaz
De: owner-openssl-users@openssl.
Hi --
Thanks for info.
I do not think I can use
lib.exe with the supplied dlls to produce the libs I need.
I think I am missing
something here that maybe, if you would, you could help me understand:
-I download Portable OpenSSL
0.9.8a from http://karajan.it.uc3m.es/~pervasive/w
hi
I'm having problems with Apache 2.0.55 mod_ssl + OpenSSL on Solaris 8
(sparc, 64-bit). When I start Apache with SSL enabled the process
dumps core during initialization when client certificate verification
has been configured with a certain certificate bundle file. The can't
be reprodu
> If nothing else, you can implement your own interpretation of "HIGH"
> and "MEDIUM", and then for MEDIUM as specified by the user change the
> string passed to the cipher setup function to include "MEDIUM+" and
> the AES128 algorithm names.
Thanks Kyle. After giving this some thought I can see i
DTLS is in openssl 0.9.8a. There are some bugs in it and it doesn't exactly
comply with the DTLS draft (the change cipherspec is incorrectly encoded).
I am still waiting for patches to fix the problems. I didn't actually code
anything with the openssl APIs. I only used the sample client/server
Hi ..
I m using Cygwin , While installing mod_ssl I got the following
error ..
“
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/mod_ssl-2.8.25-1.3.34
$ ./configure --with-apache=../apache_1.3.34
Configuring mod_ssl/2.8.25 for Apache/1.3.34
+ Apache location: ../apache_1.3.34 (Version 1.3.34)
+ Auxiliary pat
just a small thought when I get to the stage of installing new rpm (I assume this has to be done?)
then what happens to openssl rpm already installed.
is it just a question of running
rpm -Fvh
dmdm
View this message in context: Re: openssl 0.9.7a
Sent from the OpenSSL - User forum at Nabble.co
thanks for your post
a few questions if thats ok
I have lokked in the this url
http://www.openssl.org/source/tar ball(this is not a rpm so I think I was correct in not geting the tar ball
http://www.fedoralegacy.org/updates/FC2/2005-12-17-FLSA_2005_166939__Updated_openssl_packages_fix_secu
13 matches
Mail list logo
