Hi,
Does OpenSSL have AES support specifically Rijndael and if
so which is the minimum release number we need?
Thanks
Pj
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.8/163 - Release Date: 8/11/2005
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005, david kine wrote:
> In the book "Network Security with OpenSSL" on pages
> 124-125 is a list of OpenSSL commands to create a root
> CA, and a server CA signed with the root CA.
>
> My question is, how would I use the openssl CA command
> to revoke the server CA certificate b
In the book "Network Security with OpenSSL" on pages
124-125 is a list of OpenSSL commands to create a root
CA, and a server CA signed with the root CA.
My question is, how would I use the openssl CA command
to revoke the server CA certificate by the root CA,
and generate a CRL?
I have tried "o
Hi all,
Any news about that?
Nothing seems have changed on the CVS.
Regards.
-Original Message-
From: Claudiu Dragalina-Paraipan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 10/28/2005 3:07 PM
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Cc:
Subject:BIO_do_connect does not connect (bug?)
Hell
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005, Chong Peng wrote:
> thanks, dr. henson, maybe what i should ask is that if there is a way, in
> open ssl,
> to accomplish what "select" acomplishes in the regular socket api? by reading
> your answer to my question, i guess there are ways to do this. can you be a
> little
BIO_pair as with the example in ssltest.c may help to use just normal
select.
--
To verify the signature, see http://edelpki.edelweb.fr/
Cela vous permet de charger le certificat de l'autorité;
die Liste mit zurückgerufenen Zertifikaten finden Sie da auch.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005, Chong Peng wrote:
hello, does anybody here know that is there an api similar
to "select" in the regular socket socket api for open ssl?
No there isn't.
This would have to call the OSes equivalent of "select" anyway. There are
several variat
thanks, dr. henson, maybe what i should ask is that if there is a way, in open
ssl,
to accomplish what "select" acomplishes in the regular socket api? by reading
your answer to my question, i guess there are ways to do this. can you be a
little bit more specific? what exactly is "OSes equivalen
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005, Chong Peng wrote:
> hello, does anybody here know that is there an api similar
> to "select" in the regular socket socket api for open ssl?
>
No there isn't.
This would have to call the OSes equivalent of "select" anyway. There are
several variations in use each with dif
Title: Message
hello,
does anybody here know that is there an api similar
to
"select" in the regular socket socket api for open ssl?
thanks
a lot.
> Can anybody throw some light in this issue? In particular, how can
> one draw a meaningful SSL performance comparison accross
implementations?
Figure out what your typical load is like and benchmark that. For
example, 10,000 different clients connecting twice a day, and doing a
couple-doze
Actually, I have an application and a DLL. The DLL depends on the
previous libraries. And I just saw the applink.c tip in the FAQ. As I
don't really want to debug OpenSSL, but rather my application and my
DLL, I have included applink.c in my DLL project, compiled it in Debug
mode (/MDd) against
Title: Message
I'm running into
problems building a shared distribution of OpenSSL 0.9.8a on HPUX Itanium.
On Solaris I've
successfully used the following config:
./config --openssldir=/opensslSharedDist threads shared
When I try the same
config on HPUX Itanium, I get the following
Julien ALLANOS a écrit :
actually ssleay32.dll get linked against libeay32.dll, not libeay32D.dll!!
Of course I meant ssleay32D.dll.
--
Julien ALLANOS
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Us
Katie Lucas a écrit :
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 05:37:59PM +0100, Julien ALLANOS wrote:
Julien ALLANOS a écrit :
Hello,
I have a Win32 application that uses OpenSSL 0.9.8a, libxml2, xmlsec,
and other libraries. Thus I have to build them all using the same link
configuration (/MD). However I
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 07:10:31AM -0800, imana sakki wrote:
> hello, I thank you for your answers, I read in rfc2246 that the lifetime
> for session-ID is 24 houres; is there difference between this time and
> the time that you say(300 sec)?
The lifetime is whatever your application chooses to
I'd be interested to obtain some OpenSSL performance
measurement, in order to carry out comparisons against commercial
implementations. The problem is, in their marketing sheets, such
implementations frequently talk about the number of SSL transactions
per second. What does that mean? For some i
hello, I thank you for your answers, I read in rfc2246 that the lifetime for session-ID is 24 houres; is there difference between this time and the time that you say(300 sec)?Victor Duchovni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 09:17:52PM -0800, imana sakki wrote:> I want to know tha
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 05:37:59PM +0100, Julien ALLANOS wrote:
> Julien ALLANOS a écrit :
> >Hello,
> >
> >I have a Win32 application that uses OpenSSL 0.9.8a, libxml2, xmlsec,
> >and other libraries. Thus I have to build them all using the same link
> >configuration (/MD). However I want to be
19 matches
Mail list logo