On Sat, Oct 22, 2005, M G wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I noticed that the DER string representation was very very similar (longer by
> one byte) and only different by very few bytes... i.e., they are almost
> exactly the same thing I am trying to get to the cause of why the digest
> differs bet
Hi list,
I noticed that the DER string representation was very very similar (longer by one byte) and only different by very few bytes... i.e., they are almost exactly the same thing I am trying to get to the cause of why the digest differs between them
Any ideas?
Find your next car at Y
Could this software bug be something I forgot to add to my certificate when creating it? i.e., I newly create the X509 and use PEM_write_bio_X509 and PEM_read_bio_x509... Checking the digest on these 2 X509s is *supposed* to have the same fingerprint? I am really not doing much here - just writi
> Does anyone know why an X509 digest would be different after the X509 is
> written out and read back into another X509 from PEM?
Software bug. No other explanation.
/r$
--
Rich Salz Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com
This add
Hello Group...
I am a new user of openssl, and started exploring opensssl few days
back. I am running the test (make test) and generating the
report. I was analysing the logs generated and i have got some results
that has clicked some doubts as follows,
(1) If I run the tests and perform 'make r
Hi List,
Does anyone know why an X509 digest would be different after the X509 is written out and read back into another X509 from PEM?
Thanks!
Find your next car at Yahoo! Canada Autos