Title: Question about bio pairs
I know it's been talked about many times before, and I've read thru the archives, but I still don't quite get it. If I want to use I/O completion ports on Windows, I can perform the I/O as I normally would. But after reading the encrypted data off the socket,
It turns out what I needed was EVP_SealInit, so I don't need to
generate my own key. Thanks for the responses though.
Mike
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:32:03 -0800, Michael D'Errico
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
mike-mlm> I read somewhere
Hello everyone.
I would like to implement these types with openssl/asn.1:
1 H ::= [APPLICATION 0] INTEGER
2
3 I ::= [APPLICATION 1] OCTET STRING
4
5 G ::= CHOICE {
6 g_1 H,
7 g_2 I }
To do so, I have created a test program (at the end of this message).
Now, all functions but d2
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 15 Mar 2005 14:36:57 -0800, Matt
Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
MKRodriguez> I've looking at the tests in the snapshots for 0.9.8. I
MKRodriguez> am trying to figure out what functionality regarding
MKRodriguez> proxy certificates has been implemented.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:32:03 -0800, Michael
D'Errico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
mike-mlm> I read somewhere that it is a good idea to
mike-mlm> cryptographically hash your key material to
mike-mlm> generate a key, so I wrote a function to do
mike-mlm> that. I'm not e
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:20:12 -0500, "Plantier,
Spencer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
spencer.plantier> How do I fix this error?
spencer.plantier>
spencer.plantier>
spencer.plantier> Enter pass phrase:
spencer.plantier> Verifying - Enter pass phrase:
spencer.plantier>
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005, Ricardo M. Stella wrote:
>
> I found most info on how to extract a certificate (certutil) and possibly
> how to extract the private key from Netscape's format.
>
> But I'm trying to do the opposite.
>
> We have some certificate and keys already established (openssl) and wa
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005, Eric Alata wrote:
> Thank you Stephen for your reply.
>
> As expected in your answer, I have used
> ASN1_DECLARE_ITEM(TA) just before
> ASN1_CHOICE(TA). Now, it compiles.
>
> I believe to understant why this structure
> is ambiguous. Only, I need this field f2.
> If I write
Thank you Stephen for your reply.
As expected in your answer, I have used
ASN1_DECLARE_ITEM(TA) just before
ASN1_CHOICE(TA). Now, it compiles.
I believe to understant why this structure
is ambiguous. Only, I need this field f2.
If I write:
TA ::= CHOICE {
f1 SET OF TA,
f2 [10] TA,
f3 INTEG
