John:
Yes, OpenSSL was installed as part of SUSE 8.1 standard install. Thanks
for the heads up.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure why you'd want to run the query against a package that isn't
installed (that's what the p option does). Surely he wants to check it is
installed, then use
int sk;
BIO_get_fd(bio,&sk);
getpeername(sk,&address,&address_len);
On Jan 19, 2004, at 4:44 PM, Zac Hansen wrote:
I'm trying to figure out how to get the client address/port when using
BIOs to accept new connections.
__
OpenSS
> How do we escape from this deadlock?
Well, at least there is the option of taking things into own's own hands
and coding it up. Granted, that's not always feasible, esp for digging
into the depths of openssl code. :( On the other hand, at least two core
developers are looking for financial sup
I'm trying to figure out how to get the client address/port when using
BIOs to accept new connections.
I guess I can use normal accept() to od this, but I already have
everything else written and working and I'd rather not go back and mess
with it if there's an easy way I'm missing.
Thanks.
Class -- compare and contrast --
Rich Salz writes:
> > Well, make that hard choice: do you want to have your software fail
> > when an up-to-date CRL is not available, or do you want to make your
> > software susceptible to a denial-of-service attack on the CRL distro
> > process?
>
> Exactly. S
No. My understanding of ZERO_RETURN means that the SSL session has been closed down by
the other end.
I've been doing some experimenting, and a no-data condition results in a WANT-READ.
I just want to know if that means I'm stuck, unable to send data, until something
arrives.
-Original M
As a quick follow-up to my previous question.
If I call SSL_read and receive a WANT result, does that also preclude me from calling
SSL_write
if the socket is currently writable?
__
OpenSSL Project
Somebody please correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe in that case you'd receive a separate error, SSL_ERROR_ZERO_RETURN. I have, for example, experienced conditions where the end of data transmission occurred precisely on my reading buffer size. So the next SSL_raed() that I attempt results in
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 09:23:59PM +0800, Patrick Coleman wrote:
> Thanks for the help. I had a look through the headers, and found an (undocumented?)
> function
> SSL_is_init_finished(). This seems to do what I want. SSL_get_error, of course,
> would work as well.
> (Though I might to have to ke
I have yet another question regarding non-blocking I/O and the OpenSSL library.
With normal sockets that have been set to non-blocking, an attempt to read
when no data is present will return an EAGAIN.
In my case, no data on a read is fine, since that just means there are no messages to
pick up.
Dear all,
I have just put online a survey addressing the topic of "good
leadership in the open-source environment". Basically, my objective is to
identify the personal conceptions of good leadership that reside in
the minds of the contributors, in terms of leaders' _behaviors_ and
_character
Hi all,
I trying to decode the issuer and subject of X509 certs into distinguished
names.
Mainly I'm doing this:
e = X509_NAME_get_entry(x->cert_info->issuer, i);
int nid = OBJ_obj2nid(e->object);
switch(nid)
I think there must be a better way to do this. Additionally
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004, IndiWEB - Jochen Roendigs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> if I encrypt the same data with the same public key I get different
> encrypted data back which I (in 9 of 10 cases) cannot decrypt with my
> private key. Here's the details:
>
> $string="Some Important Data"; // <- This is what I
Hi,
if I encrypt the same data with the same public key I get different
encrypted data back which I (in 9 of 10 cases) cannot decrypt with my
private key. Here's the details:
$string="Some Important Data"; // <- This is what I want to encrypt
$fp=fopen ("server.crt","r"); // read the public key
$
14 matches
Mail list logo
