The maximum amount of data you can encrypt with a 1024 bit RSA key is
1024 bits of data = 128 bytes. I think PKCS1 padding adds at least 10
bytes before encoding (I might be off on this number?). You want to use
padding if you're concerned about the security of your data (pretty much
you wan
Hi..
I am using Crypto library of openSSL for RSA encryption and decryption. I am
generating RSA parameters for public modulus size of 1024. if I use
RSA_public_encrypt() using PKCS1 padding and give an input string to encrypt of
lenght 128, I get the following error:
"5977:error:0406D06E:rsa routi
On Monday 03 November 2003 16:20, Nabil Fanaian wrote:
> >Does Win2k support ec cryptography at all ?
> >
> >Nils
>
> I believe it does. I have another ECC certificate that was issued by
> Certicom and it shows up as being valid in Win2k.
Strange, could you please send me the certicom certificate
>Does Win2k support ec cryptography at all ?
>Nils
I believe it does. I have another ECC certificate that was issued by
Certicom and it shows up as being valid in Win2k.
Nabil.
__
OpenSSL Project
On Monday 03 November 2003 05:54, Nabil Fanaian wrote:
...
> However, for all ECC generated certificates, it's a different story.
> For all certificates I've generated and the ones generated by
> /openssl-SNAP-20031031/demos/ssltest-ecc/ECCcertgen.sh show up as
> invalid in Win2k. The 'General' t
This question is related to behaviour of a specific distribution beyond
the control of the OpenSSL team and hence forwarded for broad discussion.
- Forwarded message from ho k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROT
Hello group,
I'm not an expert with the use of certificates, but I think I generally
understand the process. I've got one working on an IIS web server. For the
most part it works fine. However, in some odd cases when I load one a page in
HTTPS from my site, I get a certificate prompt for eve
