- Original Message -
From: "Dattesh Lotlikar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 6:23 AM
Subject: Re: Cisco VPN Client
> Did u try "openssl req -text -inform DER -in myReq.cer" ??
> regards,
> dattesh
Yes, result:
unable to load X509 request
Did u try "openssl req -text -inform DER -in myReq.cer" ??
regards,
dattesh
- Original Message -
From: "Christian Barmala" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:48 AM
Subject: Cisco VPN Client
> Hi,
>
> I generated a certificate request with the
Steve, thanks. My understanding is that DSA signatures should be
40bytes not 48 (i.e. 2* the length of q (160 bits) accoridng to the
standard). Can you or someone else explain the difference ?
Thanks,
Frank
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003, Frank wrote:
First I c
Robert Hogan wrote:
I remember hearing somewhere recently that someone had devised a method of
reversing SHA using cached data. ...
Memory is like that, people often remember things that never
happened. ;-)
Perhaps you mean keeping a dictionary of texts, indexed by
their message digest? Here's a
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003, Christian Barmala wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I generated a certificate request with the cisco vpn client. But when I
> wanted to examin it with "openssl req -text -inform PEM -in myReq.cer", I
> got "unable to load X509 request". Why? The command won't tell me. Any
> ideas?
>
Why do
The spam is getting more aggressive now. Please make posting to the list available for
members only!
Kind regards,
Ted Lyngmo
Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> DO YOU THINK IT'S FUNNY?
>
> FUCK YOU !!!
>
> IYQFLMJTUOHBKVLYTDFXSWFIGUOSVNSQJZBJYW
_
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
