Hello List,
trustway's pkcs11-patch came with basically no info about it's usage.
Especially the handling of stored keys on the smartcard is obscure.
(openssl normally can only deal with files)
req -newkey .. seems to work, but the key is not written to the card
Please, please can anybody give s
Hi All,
I am performing an SSL load, soak and stress test on WIN CE. My test
program runs on a WIN CE PDA that has an ARM chip. The PDA talks to an
openssl UNIX server at the other end. The test program on the PDA client
uses non-blocking I/O to connect and disconnect from the SSL server. The
foll
hi all,I am porting openssl 0.9.7b to vxworks 5.4 now.
here is what I have do:
1.install active perl one my win2000 PC.
2.install cygwin
3.run ./configure no-asm no-threads --openssldir=d:\\openssl-0.9.7b vxworks-ppc405 to
generate the Makefile.ssl
but when I run make,error below occurs:
bash-2
> Hi All,
>
> I get the following error when I compile the sample program in demos/bio
>
> openssl-engine-0.9.6j> cc -I../../include -L../.. sconnect.c
> -lssl -lcrypto
>
> ../../libcrypto.a(dso_dlfcn.o): In function `dlfcn_load':
> dso_dlfcn.o(.text+0x77): undefined reference to `dlopen'
> dso_dlf
Hi All,
I get the following error when I compile the sample program in demos/bio
openssl-engine-0.9.6j> cc -I../../include -L../.. sconnect.c -lssl -lcrypto
../../libcrypto.a(dso_dlfcn.o): In function `dlfcn_load':
dso_dlfcn.o(.text+0x77): undefined reference to `dlopen'
dso_dlfcn.o(.text+0xe3):
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003, Lee Dilkie wrote:
> > It always assumes that a certifcate will have an accessible
> > current CRL. As I
> > mentioned the absence of a CRLDP extension doesn't
> > necessarily mean that the CA
> > doesn't issue CRLs: just that it doesn't give details about
> > how to download
I have configured openssl-0.9.7bThe command I used to configure is per theinstall readme. "./ "When I invoke the make command the resultis an error message as given below.Any suggestions would be helpful.[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~$ cd openssl-0.9.7b[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/openssl-0.9.7b$ makemaking all in cry
> It always assumes that a certifcate will have an accessible
> current CRL. As I
> mentioned the absence of a CRLDP extension doesn't
> necessarily mean that the CA
> doesn't issue CRLs: just that it doesn't give details about
> how to download
> them in the certificate.
>
> Steve.
Ok, so I didn'
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003, Lee Dilkie wrote:
> This question intrigues me as well. Does the crl check key on the presence
> of the crl extension in the certificate or does it assume that all
> certificates have a crl regardless of the certificate extension. I would
> expect the behaviour that you descr
When I switch the two certificates, the problem is still there -
meaning it's an application problem not a certificate problem. I'll
talk to the Binc IMAP folks about it...
Thanks for your time though! :)
Joe Auricchio ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Hi Pablo,
For the CA root certificate (self-signed, created with CA.pl -newca
then recreated with openssl ca with notafterdate 10 years from now)
Certificate:
Data:
Version: 3 (0x2)
Serial Number: 0 (0x0)
Signature Algorithm: md5WithRSAEncryption
Issuer: C=US,
11 matches
Mail list logo