[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>* Andrew Marlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>
>> I have done some more investigation and have found that ssltest
>> will compress when the TLS1 protocol is explicitly selected.
>
>I also took a look - it seems the problem is the v23 SSL/TLS method,
>it's there to provide
* Andrew Marlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> I have done some more investigation and have found that ssltest
> will compress when the TLS1 protocol is explicitly selected.
I also took a look - it seems the problem is the v23 SSL/TLS method,
it's there to provide a handshake that can negotiate a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>In message
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed,
>15 Jan 2003 17:55:05 +, Andrew Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>apm35> I have received a disappointing response to this query so far.
>
>Here's a less disappointing one: I'm looking into it. I've observed
>the same as you,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:26:59 -0800, Neil
Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
news_replies> I executed zlib external to SSL which is fairly simple and
news_replies> allows greater control over, e.g., the zlib compression level
news_replies> parameter.
Of course, one ca
Andrew Marlow,
I executed zlib external to SSL which is fairly simple and
allows greater control over, e.g., the zlib compression level
parameter.
This post is about my attempts to discover why
the ssltest program does not use compression when -zlib
is given on the command line. My openSSL is ve
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 15
Jan 2003 17:55:05 +, Andrew Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
apm35> I have received a disappointing response to this query so far.
Here's a less disappointing one: I'm looking into it. I've observed
the same as you, that the compression methods aren
This post is about my attempts to discover why
the ssltest program does not use compression when -zlib
is given on the command line. My openSSL is version 0.9.7
and was built via the command './Configure shared zlib'.
I have proved that compression does not occur.
I proved it via trace statements i
what are you compiling with? (ver)
-Original Message-
From: Wayne Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: January 10, 2003 8:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: trouble compiling
I am attempting to compile openssl-0.9.7 on my Solaris 8 Sun Blade 100
with simply ./config and make. The fo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>In message
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed,
>15 Jan 2003 10:20:46 +, Andrew Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>apm35> I would like to report a bug in openSSL version 0.9.7.
>apm35> I cannot get on-the-fly compression to work using
>apm35> SSL_COMP_add_compression_method.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 15
Jan 2003 10:20:46 +, Andrew Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
apm35> I would like to report a bug in openSSL version 0.9.7.
apm35> I cannot get on-the-fly compression to work using
apm35> SSL_COMP_add_compression_method. The performance
apm35> of the s
I would like to report a bug in openSSL version 0.9.7.
I cannot get on-the-fly compression to work using
SSL_COMP_add_compression_method. The performance
of the ssltest program is the same with or without
the -zlib command line option. My own program behaves
in a similar way. I have added trace to
11 matches
Mail list logo