Yes, md5_dgst.obj is present in tmp32.
At 11/4/2002 05:08 PM +0100, you wrote:
Oblio,
Is md5_dgst.obj present in tmp32?
If not, maybe the following kan help resolve the problem:
cd D:\Open Source\openssl-0.9.6g// or equivalent directory
make -f bcb.mak >> output.txt
and afterwards
In message <002b01c283f5$917bc8b0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 4 Nov 2002 18:30:24
+0700, "Wadim S. Dicke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
dicke> Can anybody help me with the following problem. When I compile OpenSSL
dicke> for linux-elf, 'make' passes without any errors, but when I try to do 'make
dic
evilbunny wrote:
Be interesting to have a standard cross verification scheme/policy
between free efforts where the data is sent and then some rules
applied against it if it's 98% the same or something ok it...
I was thinking about cross-certification last night, but I'm not sure if
it makes bus
Oblio,
Is md5_dgst.obj present in tmp32?
If not, maybe the following kan help resolve the problem:
cd D:\Open Source\openssl-0.9.6g// or equivalent directory
make -f bcb.mak >> output.txt
and afterwards edit output.txt to check for errors
Greetings,
Jan Serneels
-Original M
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Xperex Tim wrote:
> I don't really see the value of free certificates. If they are free
> that means that the CA can't be doing any identity checks. So any
> schmoe can get a certificate with your name on it and claim to be you.
I agree that such cert.s are essentially anonym
Hello, All!
Can anybody help me with the following problem. When I compile OpenSSL
for linux-elf, 'make' passes without any errors, but when I try to do 'make
test', it reports many memory leaks in the same place - engine_list.c, line
378
(ENGINE_new()). At first I thought that some tests were
Well, this time, for whatever reason, I got further. However, eventually,
it returned
"Error: Unresolved external '_md5_block_asm_host_order' referenced from
C:\MISC\OPENSSL\OPENSSL-ENGINE-0.9.6G\OUT32\LIBEAY32.LIB|md5_dgst"
These are the files in the out32 directory.
libeay32.BAK
libeay32.li
Oblio,
What output do you get on screen when you do following 3 commands in a
dosbox?
* cd D:\Open Source\openssl-0.9.6g //or an equivalent directory
* ms\bcb4.bat//makes bcb.mak in the current
directory
* make -f bcb.mak
Greetings,
Jan Serneels
-Origin
Unfortunately, BC3/4 doesn't work for me either. Did you get the email
from Keary Phillips? He's got some suggestions. However, they don't work
completely for me either.
At 11/4/2002 10:01 AM +0100, you wrote:
Hello Oblio,
The mak file is not good.
for instance:
n_o_T_a_s_m /Focrypt ...
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002, Hellan,Kim KHE wrote:
> In MS .NET, an RSA key can be saved to an XML file like this:
>
>
> 7M85MCazFZv2ro3mqje85mEsh6mb.
> AQAB
> M85MCazFZv..
>
>
> I have no problem in creating such an XML format from an OpenSSL RSA* structure.
> But how do I create an RS
In MS .NET, an RSA key can be saved to an XML file like this:
7M85MCazFZv2ro3mqje85mEsh6mb.
AQAB
M85MCazFZv..
I have no problem in creating such an XML format from an OpenSSL RSA* structure.
But how do I create an RSA* from this XML?
I can easily load the XML, strip the Base64 en
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> More better is package 112438-x from sunsolve.sun.com - it adds /dev/random
> Or ANDIrand package from www.sunfreeware.com (I think).- the same, better
> then SUN package I think.
Sure, but this was specified in the original post:
> > I am using IBM
Title: Re: Cert using opnssl:Kdb format to PEM Format
Hello, Scott!
*.kdb files normally are the Key-DBs used by IBM server systems, e.g. Websphere.
These are not certificates but complete “keyrings” , which could hold many different keypairs,
client-certificates, trusted certificates, request
Hello Oblio,
The mak file is not good.
for instance:
n_o_T_a_s_m /Focrypt ... should be something like n_o_T_a_s_m /F -o crypt
...
Solving this was not the only thing to do but I am not an expert on mak
files so
I followed the procedure of Borland c++ 3 and 4 and it seems to work.
14 matches
Mail list logo
