OpenSSL Command Line Tool, Private Extensions

Hello, is there a possibility to declare an use own private extensions with the OpenSSL command line tool (especially the ca and req commands)? I'm out of ideas and would be glad to get a solution from you. Best regards Gerd _

Re: Compiling on Solaris8

In message on Wed, 16 Oct 2002 10:07:17 -0500 (CDT), Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: mark> I am using Forte cc for my compiler and get this error. It seems to just mark> go wacky inside the ifdefs for DEVRANDOM, which I defined since I have mark> p

RE: Compiling on Solaris8

My only advice would be to use gcc. I can confirm that gcc 3.2 will compile openssl on Solaris 8 with no problem. Alternatively, if you don't mind an out-of-the-box openssl, get the package from www.sunfreeware.com. -Original Message- From: Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Mittwoch,

Compiling on Solaris8

I am using Forte cc for my compiler and get this error. It seems to just go wacky inside the ifdefs for DEVRANDOM, which I defined since I have patched the system to include /dev/random: making all in crypto/rand... cc -I.. -I../.. -I../../include -KPIC -DTHREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_

client-side session reuse

Hi, I'm trying to add session caching to a multi-threaded SSL client. I've run into a crash when my client, with caching enabled, is talking to an SSL server which has caching DISabled. What I see in the debugger is that if more than one client connection is coming up, and both are using the sa

PKCS12_parse problem

Greetings. I recently re-compiled my application with OpenSSL 0.9.6g (it was previously linked with 0.9.6c). I have a problem with the ''PKCS12_parse'' function that I didn't have before (platform is Solaris 8). If my application calls ''PKCS12_parse'' more than once (at different moments, eve

RE: REPOST AS REQUESTED: openssl 9.6g Redhat 7.3 Seg Fault ADDITIONAL INFO

I have just built another redhat 7.3 machine (default out of the box) using the same kernel / GCC / openssl etc the same configure options, the only difference is more memory and a faster CPU in the newer machine I get the same problem. make all works, make tests seg faults exactly the same. I a

Time use in CRL

Hi,     I'm using Openssl 0.9.6g on Linux. After I've revoked a certificate and generated a CRL, I was wonder what time source did the Openssl get to stamp in the CRL. After I generated the CRL, I used "asn1parse" to dump the CRL into ASN1 then in the CRL time section the openssl used my sys