A potential fly in the ointment here is that this article claims that
the fix is *only* for https with IE. I thought that your (and my)
problem was with IMAPS and Outlook. If it works or not, do pls report
back to reduce the number of dead ends being chased.
This fix is clearly not being distribu
Title: Message
I want to keep a key pair in shared memory.
I clearly can't keep an EVP_PKEY in there, since it uses pointers which won't be
the same from process to process. Is there some straightforward 'dehydrate this
EVP_PKEY to a blob API'?
You might do better if you didn't post HTML to a text based mailing
list.
The patches posted to this mailing list come from an OpenSSL team
member. They are similar to the patches that were incorporated into
the current distributions of 0.9.6e and 0.9.7-beta3. The patches
utilize the OpenSSLDie
Its funny how nobody is replying to this email - not even in the negative.
I will try one last time :).
Can any representative of openssl reply to the enclosed email ? In fact can
*anybody* reply please ? I would really appreciate that.
Sumeet Singh wrote:
Hi all,
This
Richard wrote:
>
> The trouble with such a scheme would be that the algorithm itself
> would still exist in the library, and can then potentially be used,
> just by a change in the INI file. Under those conditions, the
> algorithm is still there, even if not currently used (it's still
> usable,
I'm running RedHat 7.3 with openssl-0.9.6g. I had openssl installed as the
rpm install from the CD and uninstalled it and installed 0.9.6g from source.
When I try to run mutt or another app that depends on openssl (that was
installed RPM) I get the following error. If I'm not mistaken,
/lib/lib
Is there a way can get a precompiled copy of openssl as I am
having some problems compiling as I am not that good with perl?
-David
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.381 / Virus Database: 214 - Release
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 10 Aug
2002 22:05:18 -0400, "Thomas J. Hruska" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
For everyone concerned: I will comment on the binary builder proposals
when I have more time than I have right now.
The following need immediate commenting:
shinelight> >One thing th
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 10 Aug 2002
10:57:48 -0400 (EDT), Dan Kalowsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
dank> I did some searching online and didn't find any mention of this, so if
dank> it's somewhere archived, please point me there.
dank>
dank> I'm trying to fix a bug in the PHP --wit
Mark -
I have never seen this problem in the release tarballs.
The major place we hit this is in cygwin, which (depending on the setting used when
installing cygwin) may automagically unpack/untar all your source code into CR/LF
files! The only way I have ever seen it on a Linux system was wh
I have some code that runs fine with 096 but with 097beta2, it creates
the following error:
9144:error:1408F455:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:decryption failed or
bad record mac:s3_pkt.c:459:
I'm pretty sure this come from a call I made to the SSL_accept
function. In both cases however, SSL_set
11 matches
Mail list logo
