At 08:55 PM 8/9/2002 -0400, Rich Salz writeth:
>> Don't claim to support a platform if you don't intend on supporting it.
>> You have a Win32 version...so support it - completely.
>
>Two points: First, You must be knew to this whole open source thing.
>"Completely support"? Come on, I'll betch
At 02:40 AM 8/10/2002 +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker writeth:
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
Fri, 09 Aug 2002 19:39:14 -0400, "Thomas J. Hruska"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>So, the question comes back to you, in reference to 0.9.6{e,f,g}:
>would you rather have us having waited a little
Gregg Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> That being said, are the fixes in 0.9.6g reliavant to upgrading
> 0.9.6e on unix/solaris platform,
Unless you have already installed 0.9.6f, you may want to upgrade to
0.9.6g. Most problems are fixed in 0.9.6e, but there's at least a
possibility of denial of
> Should the certificate that signs the CRL be the same cert that signs the
> end-entity's certificates?
It can be, yes. In many cases it is.
> or Can any other certificate(ie., authorised to do so) can sign the CRL?
Yes, the CA can sign another cert that gives it the authority.
There are va
Hello list,
I did some searching online and didn't find any mention of this, so if
it's somewhere archived, please point me there.
I'm trying to fix a bug in the PHP --with-openssl flag, where the module
is searching for the openssl.cnf file. For more information see PHP Bug
#18295 (http://bugs
See how bad you can slaughter the english language when you don't have
coffee? ;-)
-
Andrew T. Finnell
Active Solutions L.L.C
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrew
> T. Finnell
> Sent: Saturday, August 10, 20
I feel it was pretty appropriate. We upgraded to 0.9.6e when we
saw the vuln. Now they can do a DOS instead of a Buffer Overflow
correct? The consensus in my development team was that was much better
to be able to crash the application that be able to obtain access to the
box. The only bad
Hi all,
I have a doubt regarding the certificate that signs the CRL.
Should the certificate that signs the CRL be the same cert that signs the
end-entity's certificates?
or Can any other certificate(ie., authorised to do so) can sign the CRL?
Awaiting your valuable response.
Regards
Suram
___
