Can someone provide me some assistance on
incorporating the following on a cobalt RAQ4 running linux
OpenSSL - a C library
Crypt::SSLeay and LWP
I need to install the before mentioned modules and
I am definitly wet behind the ears when it comes to this... Thank
You
Eric Wilson
That was it. Works like a charm now. Thanks for your help.
>>
>> I assume you mean do something like this in the Application client:
>>
>> ctx = SSL_CTX_new( SSLv3_server_method() );
>>
>> I tried this, SSL_connect/SSL_accept returns 0, with the following
>> error:
>>
>> 328:er
>
> I assume you mean do something like this in the Application client:
>
> ctx = SSL_CTX_new( SSLv3_server_method() );
>
> I tried this, SSL_connect/SSL_accept returns 0, with the following error:
>
> 328:error:140C5022:SSL routines:SSL_UNDEFINED_FUNCTION:called a
> function y
make .rnd file at current directory.
$ netstat -a > .rnd
- Original Message -
From: "Justin Georgeson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 2:53 AM
Subject: problem generating certficate
> Nobody responded the first time, so I'm asking again. I can
I assume you mean do something like this in the Application client:
ctx = SSL_CTX_new( SSLv3_server_method() );
I tried this, SSL_connect/SSL_accept returns 0, with the following error:
328:error:140C5022:SSL routines:SSL_UNDEFINED_FUNCTION:called a
function you should not call
It appears to me that OpenSSL needs a chunk of
randomness at the start but that it never needs more
after that. Is that right? Is there any point to
continuously doing RAND_add() as more randomness is
obtained? Thanks.
Tim
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Dear all,
My company would like to produce client certificates for its own
employees (email signing and extranet authentication). We have setup a
root ca certificate and just wonder what kind of rsa key size would be
fine for such useage. Is there a trend among the public certification
author
Ahhh,
The CU usage is *always* going to go to 100 percent, no matter how low the priority
is. The real question should have been "when I sign or encrypt, the operation adversly
affects other important processes because the s/e operation is consuming needed cpu
cycles, what can I do about this"
Maya wrote:
>I use Openssl 0.9.6c on Windows 2000.
>I use SMIME functions available and created my ATL COM which has 2 main functions
>:Encode and Decode.
>When I Sign or Encrypt messages with size about 3MB , the CPU usage goes up to
>100%. Is it possible something to be done about this? Even if
