Ok I have some ssldump information for the amchine that doesn't
work. I am trying to get the dump on a machine
That does work now. The client and server are our own applications. As
one other person stated, we already do use
SSL_CTX_set_verify (context, SSL_VERIFY_PEER, 0).
Just
Hi,
It
does work fine in microsoft internet explorer or microsoft crypto api, I
have verified it also. Take a look at link:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/prodtech/dbsql/tshtcrl.asp for
better understanding of how CRL checking done by microsoft.
All:
In reading up on the notes I have read about a memory module that can be
installed to help out the openssl. However the only one that I can find
information about is mod_mm which I have compiled for apache. Is there
another memory module that can be installed for openssl?
Jeff
___
Hello!
I encountered a problem (might be a silly one you think) when I install 0.9.6c.
My system is windows 2000, ActivePerl-5.6.1.631-MSWin32-x86, and MSVC++ 6.
Please see below.
C:\>cd C:\openssl-engine-0.9.6c
C:\openssl-engine-0.9.6c>perl Configure VC-WIN32
'perl' is not recongnized a
Based on openssl-engine-0.9.6c, we have developed a new engine which
allowsopenssl applications and Apache-mod_ssl servers to use through a
PKCS#11interface the security functions provided by the Bull trustway cc2000
cryptographiccard, taking advantage of key storage in secure memory and
Aleksey Sanin wrote:
> IMHO it's bad idea to use gcc 3.0 on Solaris now. I had very bad
> expirience
> with it in the past. If it is possible, try gcc 2.95.3.
I've had recently the occasion to compiles openssl 0.9.6 out of the box
without problem with both 2.95.3 and 3.0.3 under Solaris.
But
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 10:06:41AM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 22 Apr 2002 22:38:47 -0700,
>Aleksey Sanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> aleksey> IMHO it's bad idea to use gcc 3.0 on Solaris now. I had very
> aleksey> bad expirience with it
I've tried it on Solaris and Linux. IMHO, in both cases it is not polished
as well as it should be. Probably there exist projects there you have to
use 3.0 because of its new features. But it's not the case for me.
Aleksey.
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 22 Apr 2002 22:38:47 -0700, Aleksey
Sanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
aleksey> IMHO it's bad idea to use gcc 3.0 on Solaris now. I had very
aleksey> bad expirience with it in the past. If it is possible, try
aleksey> gcc 2.95.3.
Is that just on Solaris, or
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
on Mon, 22 Apr 2002 19:16:13 -0700, "Paul Mallary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
pmallary> I have been trying to figure this out on my own for the past day or so and
am stumped. I have installed all of the necessary stuff for openssl to compile but I
keep getting the
10 matches
Mail list logo
