Re: Re: Is OpenSSL Production Ready?

2002-04-06 Thread Michael Kobar
Fine. Then lets just call it "Powered by OpenSSL" and at least let the Apache Group sue us. But seriously, I do think that some form of "branding" would be useful. I find it very useful to both promote OpenSSL to potential users/customers and to be able to show that it is widely used in both

RE: Re: Is OpenSSL Production Ready?

2002-04-06 Thread Michael Kobar
Thanks Lutz, I just thought a page listing commercial usage (and products) on the website might be helpful. We love to brag about our OpenSSL usage! Mike On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 22:28:47PM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke wrote: > On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:31:59PM -0500, Michael Kobar wrote: > > Perhaps

Re: Is OpenSSL Production Ready?

2002-04-06 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Richard wrote: > brian> Does anyone actually use OpenSSL for a production, business > brian> operation? > > The are many programs out there that use OpenSSL. A popular one that > I use myself is the Opera browser. > > brian> We're having a heck of a time with the FAQ-documented "Page > brian>

Re: Is OpenSSL Production Ready?

2002-04-06 Thread Jeffrey Altman
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 08:15:04AM -0500, Mark H. Wood wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Lutz Jaenicke wrote: > > > To be precise: according to the OpenSSL license every program that uses > > > the library and advertises its SSL capabilities also must advertise the > > > use of OpenSSL. > > > > Ac

Re: About OpenSSL 0.9.7 release

2002-04-06 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
From: "Francesco Dal Bello" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> fdalbello> I have tried to build my company utility with fdalbello> and I have obtained a fdalbello> mistake (a function doesn't exist anymore). This mistake fdalbello> doesn't exist using 0.9.6c release. I'd like to know what function it is you'r