This is a cautionary tale. I'll sum up the
moral at the beginning: "Don't try to compile OpenSSL on Windows from
inside the Cygwin shell."
The problem, in a nutshell, is that Cygwin installs
a Cygwin-friendly perl interpreter into cygwin/bin. The reason this is an
issue has is that mkdef
hi everyone,
i am working on a ssl server, upon getting a request from the client, the server is
succesfully serving
the request. if i am going to use the same process for serving another request from
the same/different client
I get the following error during SSL_accept():
10190:error:140D9
On Monday 09 July 2001 13:52, Steven A. Bade wrote:
> OK Stupid question Where can one find SWAMP???
There's a downloadable tarball at;
http://www.geoffthorpe.net/crypto/
However, expect a heavily revamped version soon ...
Cheers,
Geoff
__
If the private key is given away, the the certificate is useless, and does not protect anything it signs.
As you seem very smart, how do you renew a certificate with openssl when you are a CA?
Cheers.
On 02 Nov 2001 09:33:19 -0800, Michael Sierchio wrote:> > Franck Martin wrote:
> >
> > I ag
I briefly tried using the Eracom patch that was submitted with a LunaCA but
was un-successful. I did not spend any time diagnosing but the framework was
good enough to make it work it would just take some time which I did not
have.
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Steven A. Bade [mailto:[EM
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 01:24:06PM -0700, dnewbold wrote:
> I'm pretty new to security, RSA, and OpenSSL. But I have encountered a
> weird problem that I hope someone on this list
> can explain. I have a demonstrable, repeatable, situation in which I can
> encrypt a user data buffer with an RSA
Netmeisters,
I've just had some trouble building shared versions of the ssl libraries
under Linux. I just did
./config shared
make
make test
make install
Make test reports no errors, but make install finishes with:
installing libcrypto.so
/usr/bin/ranlib: /usr/local/ssl/lib/libcrypto.so: File
Imran Badr wrote:
> I think Eric Rescorla responded to a similar question sometimes ago that RSA
> operation would be a limiting factor. But if you take that bottleneck away
> then I think putting SSL handshake and record porcessing layers in kernel
> space would be a next better thing to do beca
> Franck Martin wrote:
>
> I agree with you. I will make the modification. Yes the CA root certificate should
>be protected.
No, you still don't have a clue -- you don't protect a certificate, it's
essentially a public document. You protect the private key.
Hi all,
I am compiling libcurl for php on Mac OSX Server 10.1. I need
libcurl to support ssl. When I try to ./config for openssl 9.6b I get
this message.
Operating system: Power Macintosh-whatever-Darwin
This system (Darwin) is not supported. See file INSTALL for details.
Is th
That part of the license doesn't actually add anything that wasn't
already there under standard copyright terms. That part of the license
is from the days when the codebase was SSLeay, the product of Eric and
Tim. Years ago. AT the time, it was not uncommon for someone to "rip
off" open source
It's coming from the beginning. Right now i don't have the ssl_dump but
shall send it to you once i get that.
Thanks,
Venu
Eric Rescorla wrote:
Venugopal Panchamukhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
> I've modified the client code in such a way that
reading and writing
> is done in a single thread.
The last paragraph of the license says:
* The licence and distribution terms for any publically available version
or
* derivative of this code cannot be changed. i.e. this code cannot
simply be
* copied and put under another distribution licence
* [including the GNU Public Licence.]
Coul
Josh,
Thanks. After I installed gcc3, I have successfully installed SSLeay.
Thanks again.
> -Original Message-
> From: Joshua Chamas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 1:57 PM
> To: Feng, James
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Keary Suska
> Subject: Re: Problem with
Thanks to everyone for pointing me to PEM_X509_INFO_read
However I've noticed a very strange problem. If I call:
ASN1_d2i_fp(X509_new, d2i_X509, fp, NULL);
before I call PEM_X509_INFO_read(fp, NULL, myPemCallback, NULL), and the
ASN1_d2i_fp call fails, the PEM_X509_INFO_read call _always_ fa
Title: ÉϹØϵͨ£¬½±ÉÌÎñͨ£¡
ÉϹØϵͨ£¬½±ÉÌÎñͨ
Venugopal Panchamukhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>I've modified the client code in such a way that reading and writing
> is done in a single thread. But my basic problem was not cleared. When
> i'm calling select() it is returning the read condition after which the
> read_SSL() method is retu
Hi,
I have trouble building openssl-0.9.6b on a HP A400 9000/800 with
HP-UX 11i. The library builds without any warnings or errors but
the "make test" does not run.
"config -t" prints
--
Operating system: 9000/800-hp-hpux11
Configuring for hpux-parisc
Hi,
I've modified the client code in such a way that reading
and writing is done in a single thread. But my basic problem was not cleared.
When i'm calling select() it is returning the read condition after which
the read_SSL() method is returning value 0. When i tried to find out the
error usi
I agree with you. I will make the modification. Yes the CA root certificate should be protected.
However, if I use a certificate signed by the root CA, and I connect to the webserver, how do I install the root CA inside the browser without creating too much problem for the user so that the Cert
Even if it were viable to put openssl in the kernel, I personally think that
this would create more problems than it solves. For instance, any bug in the
openssl code could potentially crash the kernel, rather than simply
segfaulting. (I'm typing this in vmware, which has its own kernel modules
an
> Franck Martin wrote:
>
> I have just written a little HOWTO, to be able to handle certificates.
> I'm happy to receive comments and suggestions to improve it.
>
An alternative location for the OpenSSL configuration file can be
specified using the environment variable OPENSSL_CONF.
The comman
22 matches
Mail list logo
