Diarmuid Oneill wrote:
> I have found out that the 0.9.6 distributions of OSSL do not include
> Itanium assembly implementations for much (maybe any Itanium assembly
> at all, I didn't look) of the CPU intensive operations, including
> RSA/ModExp. So OSSL uses the C routines which are, to say the
Sorry should have had subject Re OpenSSL on itanium
Hi,
I have done a bit of research into this topic and some of my findings directly oppose what was said about the itanium not matching the P3 Mhz to Mhz.
I have found out that the 0.9.6 distributions of OSSL do not include Itanium assembly im
Are
you at OpenSSL engine 0.9.6 or 0.9.6b? There were some fixes to the engine
code between 0.9.6 and 0.9.6b which will be relevant to you if you are on
FreeBSD, AIX, or HP UX (particularly HP UX, but FreeBSD and AIX do require some
extra options to be passed to config, at version 0.9.6, fo
Bingo!
The string:
bash-2.04# OpenSSL ca -out request.pem -notext -infiles certreq.txt
where -out =the cert to be generated, and -infiles =the pending request,
the -notext option supresses the plaintext form of the certificate to the
output file. IIS 5 seems to like this.
output looks like:
Thanks. I looked at the asn1parse output and found
that d2i_RSAPrivateKey() expected an INTEGER for the
version number in the ASN1.DER file but it read
something else so it exited.
--- Dr S N Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fiel Cabral wrote:
> >
> > I'm writing a program that uses openssl t
Hello
I want to install Crypt::SSLeay on AIX box for HTTPS support.I wanted
to know which is a better option SSLeay or OPENSSL for AIX operating
system?Are there any specific steps i need to follow for this installation?
I am really thankful for to you attend to this query.
Thanks & Rega
Hello postmaster,
+
stop your silly antivirus program
+
Wednesday, August 22, 2001, 12:35:41 PM, you wrote:
pni> The file you have sent was infected with a virus but InterScan E-Mail VirusWall
pni> could not clean it.
pni> __
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 10:09:12AM -0400, Aslam wrote:
> What do u suggest on this, Openssl is not compatible with C++ code..?? Any
> work arounds for this..??
I don't see a problem. The header files have the necessary
#ifdef __cplusplus
extern "C" {
#endif
wrapping. So what you are going to su
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001 08:05:24 -0600, Nathan Bell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I still think this would all stop if the openssl mail server rejected (and
>deleted) the virus before sending the message to everyone on the list.
Just out of curiosity, why are attachments allowed on the list in the
fir
Hi,
I have done a bit of research into this topic and some of my findings directly oppose what was said about the itanium not matching the P3 Mhz to Mhz.
I have found out that the 0.9.6 distributions of OSSL do not include Itanium assembly implementations for much (maybe any Itanium assembly at al
Hi,
What do u suggest on this, Openssl is not compatible with C++ code..?? Any
work arounds for this..??
Thanks
Aslam
-Original Message-
From: Lutz Jaenicke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SSL_CTX 's app_verify_callbac
I still think this would all stop if the openssl mail server rejected (and
deleted) the virus before sending the message to everyone on the list.
Thomas Bätzler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Steven Reddie [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > Subject: Wasn't someone joking about the virus being posted b
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, chirs charter wrote:
> Nice observations. The alpha is gone now? When did DEC
> discontinue it?
DEC was discontinued. Its corpse was dismembered and sold to various
companies, and Compaq got most of the silicon designs (including the aXp
and the DS21x4x "Tulip" Ethernet chip
**
This is a message from the Scottish Qualifications Authority.
We in the Scottish Qualifications Authority hope that our e-mail always
goes to the person to whom it is addressed - but if you have received
this e-m
--- Patrick Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > Hi Lutz,
>
> Thanks for replying my question.
>
> I used purify as I figured out it may give me some
> directions on why my SSL
> client program is failing randomly. As purify
> reported 3 places there are
> reading from memory leaks.
...
Well, I
Mittente, il sistema antivirus ha individuato un virus nel file allegato.
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 12:05:23 +0200 (W. Europe Daylight Time)
Method: Mail
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
File: QUA1C129466D2ADE20.txt
Action: clean failed - deleted
Virus: TROJ_NAVIDAD.E
__
Sender, InterScan has detected virus(es) in your e-mail attachment.
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 06:19:14 -0400
Method: Mail
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
File: QUA1C129466D2ADE20.txt
Action: clean failed - deleted
Virus: TROJ_NAVIDAD.E
__
The file you have sent was infected with a virus but InterScan E-Mail VirusWall
could not clean it.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROT
Receiver, InterScan has detected virus(es) in the e-mail attachment.
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 06:19:14 -0400
Method: Mail
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
File: QUA1C129466D2ADE20.txt
Action: clean failed - deleted
Virus: TROJ_NAVIDAD.E
_
Has anyone used OpenSSL under Neutrino with a hardware accelerator? I would
appreciate any configuration details you can share.
Thanks,
James Dabbs
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TGA Technologies, Inc.
Suite 140, 100 Pinnacle Way
Norcross, GA 30071
770-441-2100 ext 126
__
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 01:27:27PM -0700, Patrick Li wrote:
> I used purify as I figured out it may give me some directions on why my SSL
> client program is failing randomly. As purify reported 3 places there are
> reading from memory leaks.
>
> 1. SHA1_Update: I ignored this one as it is gene
Hi,
> Steven Reddie [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Subject: Wasn't someone joking about the virus being posted by an
> autoresponder
>
> At least I thought it was a joke.
>
No Joke. The virus scanner run by btitele.com bounces the virus
back on the list again and again. Sadly it doesn't
Your message has not been delivered to its addressees because antivirus
software (VirusScan http://www.nai.com) detected that it contained a
computer virus or some other code (see below) that could cause damage
to the computer network of Mote Marine Laboratory. Please
check the attachments you s
dirk laurijssen wrote:
>
> Ok,
>
> I modified that,and added the OpenSSL_add_all_algorithms(), but to no avail.
> Any other hints ?
>
> Thanks & kind regards,
> dirk L.
>
What value do you get from X509_get_version? It returns the value of the
version field which is one less than the certific
At least I thought it was a joke.
Steven
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [
This message was rejected by the mail hub at The University of
Birmingham (bham.ac.uk) because it has an apparently
executable attachment "Emanuel.exe".
The email rejected was not delivered to the following
recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Executable
Antigen for Exchange found Emanuel.exe infected with Win32 (Norman,Sophos)
virus.
The file is currently Removed. The message, "Rejected Message", was
sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and was discovered in IMC Queues\Inbound
located at NDS/NDS-JER/NDSILBRIDGE.
__
Antigen for Exchange found Emanuel.exe infected with W32/Navidad-B (Sophos)
virus.
The file is currently Removed. The message, "Rejected Message", was
sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and was discovered in Wilt, Paul\Inbox
located at BellHowell/UMI Ann Arbor/AAMAIL01.
_
The MessageLabs Virus Control Centre discovered a possible
virus or unauthorised code (such as a joke program or trojan)
in an email sent by you.
Please read this whole email carefully. It explains what has
happened to your email, which suspected virus has been caught,
and what to do if you n
Your message was rejected because it has
an apparently executable attachment "Emanuel.exe".
Please read http://www.scms.waikato.ac.nz/help/mail/policy.html
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Achtung, die von Ihnen versandte Mail enthaelt entweder
einen Computer Virus oder mindestens eine beigefuegte Datei des Typs
BAT, CHM, CMD, COM, CPL, EXE, HLP, INF, INS, ISP, JAR, JS, JSE, LNK, MDB, MDE,
MSC, MSI, MSP, MST, OCX, PIF, PL, REG, SCR, SCT, SHB, SHS, VB, VBE, VBS, WSC,
WSF, WSH
und wur
The MessageLabs Virus Control Centre discovered a possible
virus or unauthorised code (such as a joke program or trojan)
in an email sent by you.
Please read this whole email carefully. It explains what has
happened to your email, which suspected virus has been caught,
and what to do if you n
Antigen for Exchange found Emanuel.exe infected with W32/Navidad.e@M (McAfee4) virus.
The file is currently Removed. The message, "Rejected Message", was
sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and was discovered in SMTP Messages\Inbound
located at Corrent Organization/First Administrative Group/CORMAIL01.
Antigen for Exchange found Emanuel.exe infected with W32/Navidad.e@M (McAfee4) virus.
The file is currently Removed. The message, "Rejected Message", was
sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and was discovered in SMTP Messages\Inbound
located at Corrent Organization/First Administrative Group/CORMAIL01.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 03:04:59PM -0600, Nathan Bell wrote:
> I have a very unfortunate bug. Whenever I try to have a client connect
> to my server, the handshake fails because of
> SSLerr(SSL_F_SSL3_GET_CLIENT_HELLO,SSL_R_NO_SHARED_CIPHER) being called.
>
> My session has no ciphers in it (???)
Ok,
I modified that,and added the OpenSSL_add_all_algorithms(), but to no avail.
Any other hints ?
Thanks & kind regards,
dirk L.
int
validate_ssl (int ok, char *ip, char *protocol, char *subject,char *issuer, unsigned
char *cert, int length, int depth,char **message)
{
char *cp;
char
36 matches
Mail list logo
