Hi,
I've been trying to create a certificate for a Windows 2000 server with
IIS5 so I would be able to use IMAPS.
Does anyone have some info about how to do this?
I've managed to sign the keyrequest file that the IIS5 wizard creates, but
I get this error "The Pending certificate request for
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 02:02:46PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
> I have OpenSSLinstalled, but when I use my site with
> https://www.mydomain.com.? I will pop out a message saying that:
>
>
>
> "The security certificate was issued by a company you have not chosen to
> trust.? View t
From: Nathan Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
nbell> There is already support for drop-in cryptography, but doing drop-in
nbell> memory management seems like a more highly applicable feature. After
nbell> already having done this I realize that it is not a daunting task. It
nbell> would've been even bett
From: "Kees Zeelenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: openssl for MS-Windows
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 22:36:10 +0200
Message-ID: <004201c129b7$c449a800$ed2cfb3e@beta>
kees.zeelenberg> > Can I ask you to mail us the exact changes in form of a
kees.zeelenberg> > patch or something like that, so Op
From: Tom Biggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
tbiggs> I'm on another list, where emails are set up to Reply-To the list,
tbiggs> and we *never* see any auto-reply, virus warnings, could-not-deliver,
tbiggs> or any other spurious auto-generated mails. And it's been that way
tbiggs> for years, so I doubt th
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 01:33:18PM +0200, Michael Ströder wrote:
> > I just wonder why this program send this info to the list and not
> > to the person who sent the virus ;-)
>
> Because the mailing list processor is configured to set the Reply-To
> address to the list address. IMHO this should
Hi,
I'm attempting to sign a certificate request using the CA.pl script included
with OpenSSL.
Configuration:
-Slackware 8
-OpenSSL 0.9.6b
When I attempt to issue the ./CA.pl -sign command I get the following error:
[16:56:42][root@victory-260]# ./CA.pl -sign
Using configuration from /etc/ssl/
I'm writing a program that uses openssl to read the
private key from a ASN1.DER encoded file. The openssl
API outputs the following:
17752:error:0D080071::lib(13) :func(128)
:reason(113):a_int.c:191:
17752:error:0D09D082::lib(13) :func(157)
:reason(130):d2i_r_pr.c:124:
I'm using the load_key() f
I'm in agreement, there is a reason that most mailers have a "Reply-All" or
"Reply-Group" function after all. Don't munge Reply-To!
- Original Message -
From: "Steven Reddie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:09 AM
Subject: RE: Please reconfigur
Receiver, InterScan has detected virus(es) in the e-mail attachment.
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 17:57:49 +0200 (W. Europe Daylight Time)
Method: Mail
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
File: QUA1C129466D2ADE20.txt
Action: deleted
Virus: TROJ_NAVIDAD.E
__
Sender, InterScan has etected virus(es) in your e-mail attachment.
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 17:57:49 +0200 (W. Europe Daylight Time)
Method: Mail
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
File: QUA1C129466D2ADE20.txt
Action: deleted
Virus: TROJ_NAVIDAD.E
Sender, InterScan has etected virus(es) in your e-mail attachment.
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 17:58:45 +0200 (W. Europe Daylight Time)
Method: Mail
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
File: QUA1C129477534DCA0.txt
Action: deleted
Virus: TROJ_NAVIDAD.E
Your message was rejected because it has
an apparently executable attachment "Emanuel.exe".
Please read http://www.scms.waikato.ac.nz/help/mail/policy.html
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Your message was rejected because it has
an apparently executable attachment "Emanuel.exe".
Please read http://www.scms.waikato.ac.nz/help/mail/policy.html
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
The file you have sent was infected with a virus but InterScan E-Mail VirusWall
could not clean it.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROT
The file you have sent was infected with a virus but InterScan E-Mail VirusWall
could not clean it.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROT
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 03:18:20PM +0200, Carsten Rhod Gregersen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to create an library for transfering special info between
> an client and a webserver. But I have run into some strange problems.
>
> I can connect to all kinds of webservers but one is allways failing.
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 09:14:54AM -0600, Nathan Bell wrote:
> What does SSL_CTRL_EXTRA_CHAIN_CERT mean when returned from
> SSL_accept()?
??? Since when does SSL_accept() return SSL_CTRL_EXTRA_CHAIN_CERT?
> Also, is there any documentation as to the meaning of any of that type
> of definition (
What does SSL_CTRL_EXTRA_CHAIN_CERT mean when returned from
SSL_accept()?
Also, is there any documentation as to the meaning of any of that type
of definition (openssl/ssl.h line 826-870)?
--
Nathan Bell
Companion Corporation
Evelyn Manufacturing
801-943-7277
Etc...
><));>
>-Original Message-
>From: Amos Gouaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: 20 August 2001 14:03
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Please reconfigure majordomo to not set Reply-To (was:
>Failed to clean virus file Emanuel.exe)
>
>
>> On Mon, 20 Aug 2001 05:00:01 -0700,
>> Caliban T
Mittente, il sistema antivirus ha individuato un virus nel file allegato.
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:14:23 +0200 (W. Europe Daylight Time)
Method: Mail
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
File: Emanuel.exe
Action: clean failed - deleted
Virus: T
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2001 05:00:01 -0700,
> Caliban Tiresias Darklock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ctd) writes:
ctd> On Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:33:18 +0200, Michael Ströder
ctd> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Because the mailing list processor is configured to set the Reply-To
>> address to the list addr
Hi,
I'm trying to create an library for transfering special info between
an client and a webserver. But I have run into some strange problems.
I can connect to all kinds of webservers but one is allways failing.
I've debugged with returning the sslstate within the program, giving me:
Before co
This message was rejected by the mail hub at The University of
Birmingham (bham.ac.uk) because it has an apparently
executable attachment "Emanuel.exe".
The email rejected was not delivered to the following
recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Executable
Your message was rejected because it has
an apparently executable attachment "Emanuel.exe".
Please read http://www.scms.waikato.ac.nz/help/mail/policy.html
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> >Because the mailing list processor is configured to set the Reply-To
> >address to the list address. IMHO this should be changed to reduce
> >such problems with automatic replies (vacation e-mails, virus-scans
> >etc.).
>
> But that would make *regular* replies a pain in the ass for list
> memb
>[not setting Reply-To]
>
> > But that would make *regular* replies a pain in the ass for list
> > members.
>
>The amount of such "accidents" like this one or the vacation mail
>disaster that seems to hit this list every few weeks is much more
>than on any other high-volume list that I know. I th
Antigen for Exchange found Emanuel.exe infected with Win32 virus.
The file is currently Deleted. The message, "quick and dirty tunnel to SSL
?", was
sent from ¹é»ó¼ö and was discovered in Raji Abdelaziz\Inbox
located at Breakwater Communications/BREAKWATER/NT2.
___
Receiver, InterScan has detected virus(es) in the e-mail attachment.
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:29:02 +0200 (W. Europe Daylight Time)
Method: Mail
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
File: Emanuel.exe
Action: clean failed - deleted
Virus: TROJ_N
The file you have sent was infected with a virus but InterScan E-Mail VirusWall
could not clean it.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROT
[not setting Reply-To]
> But that would make *regular* replies a pain in the ass for list
> members.
The amount of such "accidents" like this one or the vacation mail
disaster that seems to hit this list every few weeks is much more
than on any other high-volume list that I know. I think the b
Antigen for Exchange found Emanuel.exe infected with W32/Navidad-B (Sophos)
virus.
The file is currently Removed. The message, "quick and dirty tunnel to SSL
?", was
sent from and was discovered in Wilt, Paul\Inbox
located at BellHowell/UMI Ann Arbor/AAMAIL01.
___
Antigen for Exchange found Emanuel.exe infected with W32/Navidad-B (Sophos)
virus.
The file is currently Removed. The message, "quick and dirty tunnel to SSL
?", was
sent from and was discovered in Wilt, Paul\Inbox
located at BellHowell/UMI Ann Arbor/AAMAIL01.
___
Receiver, InterScan has detected virus(es) in the e-mail attachment.
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 08:28:07 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Method: Mail
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
File: Emanuel.exe
Action: clean failed - deleted
Virus: TROJ_NAV
Sender, InterScan has detected virus(es) in your e-mail attachment.
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 08:28:07 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Method: Mail
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
File: Emanuel.exe
Action: clean failed - deleted
Virus: TROJ_NAVI
Receiver, InterScan has detected virus(es) in the e-mail attachment.
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:21:43 +0200 (W. Europe Daylight Time)
Method: Mail
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
File: Emanuel.exe
Action: deleted
Virus: TROJ_NAVIDAD.E
_
Receiver, InterScan has detected virus(es) in the e-mail attachment.
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 08:28:00 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Method: Mail
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
File: Emanuel.exe
Action: clean failed - deleted
Virus: TROJ_NAV
Sender, InterScan has detected virus(es) in your e-mail attachment.
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 08:28:00 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Method: Mail
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
File: Emanuel.exe
Action: clean failed - deleted
Virus: TROJ_NAVI
Antigen for Exchange found Emanuel.exe infected with Win32 (Norman,Sophos)
virus.
The file is currently Removed. The message, "Re: quick and dirty tunnel to
SSL ?", was
sent from =?ks_c_5601-1987?B?uem787z2?= and was discovered in IMC
Queues\Inbound
located at NDS/NDS-JER/NDSILBRIDGE.
__
Antigen for Exchange found Emanuel.exe infected with W32/Navidad.e@M (McAfee4) virus.
The file is currently Removed. The message, "Re: quick and dirty tunnel to SSL ?", was
sent from =?ks_c_5601-1987?B?uem787z2?= and was discovered in SMTP Messages\Inbound
located at Corrent Organization/First A
Antigen for Exchange found Emanuel.exe infected with W32/Navidad.e@M (McAfee4) virus.
The file is currently Removed. The message, "Re: quick and dirty tunnel to SSL ?", was
sent from =?ks_c_5601-1987?B?uem787z2?= and was discovered in SMTP Messages\Inbound
located at Corrent Organization/First A
Destinatario, il sistema antivirus ha individuato un virus nel file allegato.
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:14:23 +0200 (W. Europe Daylight Time)
Method: Mail
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
File: Emanuel.exe
Action: clean failed - deleted
Virus
Hello,
i need to generate a certificate with two OUs in the Issuer ( the CA
Cert ) and the Subject DN ( the consumer ). When i look in the generated
Certs there are two OU in the right order, but when i convert this cert
to p12, import it into the Netscape Browser Ver 4.76 under Linux, the
Order
Hello,
can somebody help me to configure my openssl.cnf ( or other things ) to
remove the E-Mail Field as a part of the subject ( and Issuer ) DN
within a certificate ?
Thanks for your Help.
Regards,
Robert Hannemann
Computer Center
Saxony-Anhalt
Germany
+49 345 1304 883
___
On Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:33:18 +0200, Michael Ströder
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Because the mailing list processor is configured to set the Reply-To
>address to the list address. IMHO this should be changed to reduce
>such problems with automatic replies (vacation e-mails, virus-scans
>etc.).
Bu
Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
>
> At 09:13 ¤W¤È 2001/8/20 +0200, you wrote:
>
> > The file you have sent was infected with a virus but InterScan
> > E-Mail VirusWall
> > could not clean it.
>
> I just wonder why this program send this info to the list and not
> to the person who sent the virus ;-)
B
Hello openssl-users,
This is repeat, but i stil didnt get responce on it , and problem
still remains. If its only problem at me , just do this test please,
and see, if works ok... please
I use openssl pretty long time, but only in "simple mode". Recently ,
installed version 96b (major release) a
Hello openssl-users,
I use openssl in one server application, thus, i would like to have no
memory leaks. I noticed that then more crypts/decrypts/key creation i do then more
memory my app uses. So, i have question :
do i need to clean something after enc = EVP_des_ede3_cbc(); ?
does BIO_free_all
Antigen for Exchange found Emanuel.exe infected with Win32 (Norman,Sophos)
virus.
The file is currently Removed. The message, "Re: quick and dirty tunnel to
SSL ?", was
sent from =?ks_c_5601-1987?B?uem787z2?= and was discovered in IMC
Queues\Inbound
located at NDS/NDS-JER/NDSILBRIDGE.
__
Your message has not been delivered to its addressees because antivirus
software (VirusScan http://www.nai.com) detected that it contained a
computer virus or some other code (see below) that could cause damage
to the computer network of Mote Marine Laboratory. Please
check the attachments you s
This message was rejected by the mail hub at The University of
Birmingham (bham.ac.uk) because it has an apparently
executable attachment "Emanuel.exe".
The email rejected was not delivered to the following
recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Executable
Sender, InterScan has detected virus(es) in your e-mail attachment.
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 03:12:16 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Method: Mail
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
File: Emanuel.exe
Action: clean failed - deleted
Virus: TROJ_NAVI
The file you have sent was infected with a virus but InterScan E-Mail VirusWall
could not clean it.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROT
53 matches
Mail list logo
