Hi,
I am wondering if the signature of an X509v3
certificate is automatically checked when you make an SSL connection or do you
have to do the signature check of the certificate in the verify_callback
function by yourself?
Thanks and kind regards,
Filip
Filip Van de Vel
Thanks for giving me a clue! Got that working.
However, the error "information" isn't informative at all. The only error
on the stack is:
'error:140790E5:SSL routines:SSL23_WRITE:ssl handshake failure'
Well, I kind of assumed THAT! What I want to know is WHY it failed. Where
does it
Eric Rescorla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Obviously, scatter/gather I/O is of value when you're not doing SSL.
> That's why writev() and readv() exist in the first place. However,
> this isn't an argument for SSL_writev() to exist, it's an argument
> for BIO_writev() to exist. Then the socket BI
Michael Wojcik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Just use buffered I/O.
>
> I'd be interested to hear if this works (ie. if in practice it generally
> manages to coalesce adjacent sends). I imagine it would, but I haven't
> tested it yet. Of course, this will involve a buffer copy.
I have tested
hai julien,
currently the openssl documentation is incomplete. the best way to understand about
ssl, is to play the demo programs that are provided along with the source.
u can start with the s_server.c and s_client.c programs to understand about ssl.
though they are not clear, for beginners as
Thanks for the offer. There's not much to do, I've just got to find the
time. Perhaps tonight after work will finish it off.
Steven
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dave Cherry
Sent: Friday, 10 August 2001 6:46 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Great. Let me know how you're getting on.
Thanks
Charles
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steven Reddie
> Sent: Friday, 10 August 2001 12:48 p.m.
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Is there a windows CE version of the OpenSSL libr
