Ooops, sorry, I just didn't notice the option 'Open file from original
location'. For more information on setup Client Certificate in IE you can
view KB from microsoft, here is the URL:
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q218/4/45.ASP
This page is for Certificate server and IIS4, but
Hello world,
I got a verisign Class 1 personal 60 days tryal certificate instaled in
Explorer.
I can see it under 'Personal' certificates. It verifies ok. But still, when
I want to authorize myself to a SSL web server which asks for client
authorization, the certificate is not displayed in t
From: "Scott Schenkein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Are you talking about the s_client utility or the OpenSSL libraries?
There's no direct proxy support at all in OpenSSL, but if you're using
the OpenSSL libraries, you can add your own proxying filter as you see
fit.
schenksj> Sorry I didn't specify...
No my friend, I mean exactly the opposite thing. I don't know ASP at all, but
I'd figure your code is well. At least it seems quite similar
to my Perl code (which I posted a few days ago). Anyway, the server side is
ok. Now when IE receives the file with the certificata, it
asks "What do you wan
So you mean save the file to disk then open in from explorer? Here is my
code in ASP for sending the cert to IE:
<%
'Finding root cert
strScriptPath = Request.ServerVariables("PATH_TRANSLATED")
strPathOnly = Left(strScriptPath, InStrRev(strScriptPath, "\"))
strRoo
Hi Benny. It was an error. I have IE 5.0 of course. And I did it again just a
few minutes ago from IE 4.0. After that dialog box try "opening
the file from...bla bla".
Rodrigo.
Benny Chandra wrote:
I think the latest version of IE is 5.5? How can you get IE 5.9, or it
is not for PC?. I try
I
think the latest version of IE is 5.5? How can you get IE 5.9, or it is not for
PC?. I try sending MIME header application//x-x509-ca-cert in IE 5.01 and it
open save dialog box instead intalling those certificate.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
Sorry I didn't specify... I mean client communicaiton...
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Schenkein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2000 11:07 PM
Subject: SOCKS
> Hello All,
>
> Is there a way to get openssl to communicate over sockets through a s
Hello All,
Is there a way to get openssl to communicate over sockets through a socks
proxy server???
Please respond directly to me, as well as to the list.
Scott Schenkein
---
Owner, Virtual Imagery Design Group
__
How about if in Verify box I see, Verification failed: Not certified for
email?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Vlasta Joskova
Sent: 12 Agustus 2000 20:53
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: help! problem with certificate!!
Have you set you
Silly me, Yes that was the problem, my version of IE5 was the 40bit
version :(.
Got it sorted now, and it works to :)
Regards
Andrew
- Original Message -
From: Theodore Hope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 6:41 AM
Subject:
> Yanbing wrote:
>
> All thread should use ONE ssl ctx?!! You mean in one process only ONE
> ssl_ctx can exist?
Multiple SSL_CTX can exist in a process though some multithreaded
applications have one SSL_CTX. They typically have SSL structures in
each thread obtained from the single SSL_CTX.
St
Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
>
>
> Interesting. Could you send me an example? I'll see if I can find out
> what it is and (hopefully) add support to OpenSSL.
>
Scrub that request. If its just the base64 encoded opaque signing I've
seen one of those before. I was thinking it might do something like
ukoeppe wrote:
>
> From: Dr Stephen Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Well IE5 doesn't handle email so I presume you mean something like
> > Outlook or Outlook express.
>
> Right
>
> >
> > What do you mean by "undecipherable code"?
> >
> > Is it just binary gibberish or does it look like a base64
ukoeppe wrote:
>
> > I've seen similar things with messages sent with outlook. I have a
> > very quick look, and it seems like there's smoe extra embedding in a
> > PKCS7 packet of some sort, and I didn't find a way to extract the
> > message that was apparently in there with openssl, at least i
From: Dr Stephen Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Well IE5 doesn't handle email so I presume you mean something like
> Outlook or Outlook express.
Right
>
> What do you mean by "undecipherable code"?
>
> Is it just binary gibberish or does it look like a base64 encoded
> messsage?
You're right of c
All thread should use ONE ssl ctx?!! You mean in one process
only ONE ssl_ctx can exist?
Gott, I have totally wrong understood.
Is there any multi-thread example?
Many Thanks you for your help, steve. Without that I have no
chance to know this trick.
Zhang
ukoeppe wrote:
>
> Hi, I got a problem with ie5 which makes me a little nervous. I can encrypt
> and sign messages and send them to someone with an IE5 (verisign key on the
> other side), my own key and cert are homemade with openssl. No problem.
>
Well IE5 doesn't handle email so I presume you
> I've seen similar things with messages sent with outlook. I have a
> very quick look, and it seems like there's smoe extra embedding in a
> PKCS7 packet of some sort, and I didn't find a way to extract the
> message that was apparently in there with openssl, at least in the
> couple of minutes
From: "ukoeppe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ukoeppe> But if the other party answers with an encrypted and signed
ukoeppe> message using IE5 and I decrypt the message with openssl I
ukoeppe> just get some undecipherable code as output (no error
ukoeppe> message). If the message in IE5 was only encrypted
Hi, I got a problem with ie5 which makes me a little nervous. I can encrypt
and sign messages and send them to someone with an IE5 (verisign key on the
other side), my own key and cert are homemade with openssl. No problem.
But if the other party answers with an encrypted and signed message using
> I seem to only be getting 40bit, this is governed by the certificate and
> not the
> compiled version of openssl or apache that im using?
>
> I generated a test certificate from Thawte and installed it and
> requested
> a 128bit certificate but still only get 40bit connection, or am i
> bark
Richard,
> Out of curiosity, why would it be important to make sure the RSA key
> is password-protected here:
>
> ssl> * Generate the RSA keys into a password-protected file,
> ssl> using some file as random data seed.
> ssl> Make sure you remember the "PEM pass phrase" used to
> ssl> prot
23 matches
Mail list logo
