> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Haar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 7:03 PM
> I feel everyone is missing the point.
No, we're discussing a different point. You're talking about signing
certificates for your own private use; we're talking about signing them f
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Snyder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 1:10 PM
> ps. As an aside, which is considered safer BF w/ 16 bytes or
> DES w/ 24?
That depends whom you ask. There are cryptography professionals who argue
that newer cyphers (like Blo
> -Original Message-
> From: Yuji Shinozaki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 11:16 PM
> Hey, maybe we DO need a sanctioning body, but then how do you decide to
> trust them? And how do you get the existing CA's to play ball?
We live and work with myriad trust rela
>sense to me. In the meantime, I believe there is a strong need for an
>alternative to the VeriSign free certificates.
You can get your free client certificate for private use at TC TrustCenter
http://www.trustcenter.de/english/693.htm
then follow the links.
...and it is valid for one year
S
I'm running Linux on a MIPS processor,
when I try: /usr/sbin/openssl s_server
everything works fine.
When I try: /usr/sbin/openssl s_client
I get:
connect: Connection refused
connect:errno=146
and the entry below in the error_log-ssl:
[Tue May 23 11:40:18 2000] [error] OpenSSL: error:14080074:
Try adding another "w" to that web address.
-Original Message-
From: Mocha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 11:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Certificate Authority
At 03:14 PM 5/23/00 -0700, Steve Cook wrote:
>At 01:43 PM 5/23/00 -0500,
RTF file
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 05:12:24PM -0700, Arun Venkataraman wrote:
> AFAIK, it is upto rainbow technologies to provide a patch for OpenSSL 0.95.
Wouldn't it be possible to use the BSAFE patches for OpenSSL, and then
use CryptoSwift's BSAFE interface?
Jim R
LockStar
_
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ... On Behalf Of Jason Haar
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 8:03 PM
...
> Subject: Re: Certificate Authority
>
> I feel everyone is missing the point.
It strikes me that there is another need: personal certificates for email
(authenticated an
Hi,
my name is Hungdan Ly and I just downloaded the Crypt-SSLeay-0.16. I'm running
Perl v5.00502. I got your contact info from the README file. Sorry to
inconvenience you but I need your help. I'm trying to write a perl script that
will go to an https server (let's call it server1.mydomain.
I hope you tried www.equifaxsecure.com and not ww.equifaxsecure.com as
stated below...
Mocha wrote:
>
> At 03:14 PM 5/23/00 -0700, Steve Cook wrote:
> >At 01:43 PM 5/23/00 -0500, Mocha wrote:
> >
> > >i just feel that charging someone over $300/yr (verisign) is rediculous.
> > >with the acquisit
I try to sent one message and i dont see it in mailing list
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager
I'd just like to point out that an Open Community CA is different than
an
Open Source CA. The latter is obviously addressed by the OpenCA.org ini-
tiative which, BTW, I don't know if it's getting any momentum at all.
The first one implies that you have a CA where everyone can register and
fetch a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I am sorry you did not get a response directly from Thawte about
>this query. We have in fact received confirmation from Microsoft
>that a hotfix has been issued for this. This hotfix is currently
>available. Also a future service pack will correct this in Win2000.
>
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 12:02:55PM +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
> I feel everyone is missing the point.
>
> What do I do as a company when I want to "acquire" 1,000's of user certs so
> that my users can (e.g.) use IPSec VPN solutions over the Internet to
> access corporate services?
>
> I don't _n
If a company hasn't renewed it's certificate, it is either out of business
or inept at keeping them up to date. Both are legitimate concerns for any
user.
John
-Original Message-
From: Rusty Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 May 2000 23:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED
> This is also sort of a behaviour question. If someone connects to a
> web server and that server's certificate has expired, should that
> person really be concerned since the information they're sending back
> to the server is still probably encrypted?
Sure, it's still encrypted -- in fact tha
I finally got the 0.9.5 patches out of them. Not well designed, I'm
afraid.
I'll fix what I can and see if they're willing to take diffs.
On Tue, 23 May 2000, Arun Venkataraman wrote:
> >Does 0.9.5 support the Cryptoswift line of SSL accelerators? Is anyone
> >using one under Solaris 2.6?
18 matches
Mail list logo
