Re: starting apache with ssl

On Fri, May 05, 2000 at 03:43:33PM -0400, Salz, Rich wrote: > >Can they use it on any machine? I thought the certificates are tied > >to a specific host name. > > Only in that the browser *may* warn you if the CN component doesn't match > the domain name of the server that the client has connect

Re: BN functions and Solaris 7 'bc' disagree

> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker (Wed 03.0500-19:09): > e and n constitute the public key, d constitutes the private key > (actually, d and n, but since the private key blob usually includes > the public key as well, this isn't really said :-)). ok. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Mail Rejected

Achtung, die von Ihnen versandte Mail wurde nicht weitergeleitet! Zur Zeit akzeptiert der Magistrat Wien nur Nachrichten in reinem Text Format. Attention, your mail has not been delivered! At the moment we are accepting messages in plain text only. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Unsent message follows

Mail Rejected

Achtung, die von Ihnen versandte Mail wurde nicht weitergeleitet! Zur Zeit akzeptiert der Magistrat Wien nur Nachrichten in reinem Text Format. Attention, your mail has not been delivered! At the moment we are accepting messages in plain text only. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Unsent message follows

Re: starting apache with ssl

El dom, 30 de abr de 2000, a las 21:49, Brian J. Rohan escribió: > I used open_ssl, mod_ssl, and apache to create a secure web server. > Everything as far as I can tell works great. I can get the server to > start at boot time, and I can go in and start the ssl server manually by > typing ./apach

Re: Storng encryption?

By time to time people ask this question. It's the browser that doesn't support 128 keys not Open SSL. Use the US version or Fortify for Netscape.   Salvatore Ilardoe-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Web site: http://www.rokeby.comPhone: +44 1908 393601 - Original Message - From: chee

RE: starting apache with ssl

>Can they use it on any machine? I thought the certificates are tied >to a specific host name. Only in that the browser *may* warn you if the CN component doesn't match the domain name of the server that the client has connected to. /r$ ___

Mail Rejected

Achtung, die von Ihnen versandte Mail wurde nicht weitergeleitet! Zur Zeit akzeptiert der Magistrat Wien nur Nachrichten in reinem Text Format. Attention, your mail has not been delivered! At the moment we are accepting messages in plain text only. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Unsent message follows

Re: starting apache with ssl

Can they use it on any machine? I thought the certificates are tied to a specific host name. Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 14:43:45 -0500 From: Karl Denninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: starting apache with ssl (You can remove the password from the certificate

RE: C equivalent of a perl function

> Anyone would know what is the C equivalent of: > pack('H*', $data) This is HARDLY related to OpenSSL. x.c

RE: patent issues

Douglas Wikström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked for a more detailed description of the MultiPrime RSApkc technique than the RSA press release on RSA's licensing agreement with Compaq: http://www.rsasecurity.com/news/pr/000411-1.html Try: http://www.tandem.com/brfs_wps/esscptt

RE: Without, RSA why doesnt it connect?

>Well I dont understand something about this. Dont all the servers say they >support, and isnt it in the ssl spec, that they support RSA, DH, etc... Specs often say "if you do XXX, then do it this way." The SSL document, for example, didn't require all those crypto mechanisms. It just specified

Re: FTP and SSL

> > At least one implementation is required for Proposed and that > > implementation does not need to implement all features.. > No, this is simply wrong. See RFC2026. > >Usually, neither implementation nor operational experience is >required for the designation of a specification as a P

Re: C equivalent of a perl function

Odpowiedz automatyczna: Do 5 maja przebywam na zasluzonym urlopie. W pilnych sprawach prosze o kontakt z Kamilem Kilinskim. Z powazaniem, Michal Trojnara >>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" 05/05/00 16:43 >>> AFAIK there is not a =~ On Thu, 04 May 2000, Paul Khavkine wrote: > Hi. > > Anyone would kno

Re: FTP and SSL

> > >So it appears that your client "might" support AUTH SSL or AUTH TLS > >but does not support the non-standard ftps ports. > > Specifying the host as 'host.school.edu:port' changes the behavior > of the client, so I am assuming that the client will point to whatever is > specified.

Re: FTP and SSL

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > From: Richard Levitte > > >Uhmmm, yes. Note that I said "wide-spread fashion". The reason I > >said that is that I never trust a draft to stay current. I trust > >an RFC a lot more. > > This is an interesting one !! SSL isn't RFC (it only ever made it to > draft)