The netscape plugin? Or the java plugin? If it's the netscape plugin do
you have a url to it's api?
-5
On Fri, 17 Dec 1999, Michael Pogrebisky wrote:
> The method uses Netscape plug-in, so you can make your conclusions.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Cooke [mailto:[EM
Send a http link. That's what I do when i have 50 plus lines.
ex.
http://www.foo.com/~home/codesnippit.html
-5
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999, Michael Pogrebisky wrote:
> I just didn't want to bother all mailing list subscribers with a fairly
> large piece of code, which is not directly related to the m
SSL_connect and SSL_accept both work for non-block socket. SSL has an
internal
machine. So, multiple SSL_connect/SSL_accpet will advance the state machine.
It will not restart SSL handshake.
In fact, SSL_read will also jump to SSL_accept if the current connection
is going to renegotiate.
Cheers
FYI.
http://www.verisign.com/press/1999/corporate/1220_thawte.html
<>
VeriSign Press Release.url
Oliver King wrote:
>
> - cipher suites such as DH-RSA-DES-CBC-SHA and DH-DSS-DES-CBC-SHA are _not_
> supported; for these, the Diffie-Hellman parameters form part of the
> server's certificate, and the whole lot has been signed by a CA (using RSA
> or DSA), so the Diffie-Hellman parameters are fi
Its a DSS restriction AFAIK. I've never seen it used with anything else
and the standard specifically states you use SHA1.
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. http://www.drh-consultancy.demon.co.uk/
Personal Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior crypto engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.
thail wrote:
>
> I received the test certificate as a part of an email, and just cut and paste it to
>a files and name it "server.crt".
> So it's not binary, I tried
>
> openssl pkcs7 -inform DER -out certs.pem -in server.crt -print_certs
>
> this is the error :
>
> >unable to load PKCS7 o
This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason:
The following destination addresses were unknown (please check
the addresses and re-mail the message):
SMTP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
if you feel this message to be in error.
Reporting-MTA: dns; mail.uws
> Without some alternative mode of server authentication, of course,
> Anon DH remains a pretty scary proposition -- all the more so because it
> implies a level of trustworthiness that it can not provide.
In the telnet protocol we would like to use Anon-DH in conjunction
with RFC 1416 ba
This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason:
The following destination addresses were unknown (please check
the addresses and re-mail the message):
SMTP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
if you feel this message to be in error.
Reporting-MTA: dns; mail.uws
I received the test certificate as a part of an email, and just cut and paste it to a
files and name it "server.crt".
So it's not binary, I tried
openssl pkcs7 -inform DER -out certs.pem -in server.crt -print_certs
this is the error :
>unable to load PKCS7 object
>62:error:0D091007:asn1 enc
On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 01:18:04PM +0100, Nicolas Roumiantzeff wrote:
> As SSL_connect and SSL_accept make several calls to the underlying socket
> API, the SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ failure can happen in the middle of the
> processing, not just on the first read, so calling it later wont work
> becau
This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason:
The following destination addresses were unknown (please check
the addresses and re-mail the message):
SMTP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
if you feel this message to be in error.
Reporting-MTA: dns; mail.uws
Hi everyone,
I notice that the OpenSSL only supports the DSA signature algorithm with SHA
and SHA-1 message digests. Is this a limitation of OpenSSL or of the DSS
Digital Signature Standard?
Thanks in advance
Ollie King
Data Connection Ltd
__
This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason:
The following destination addresses were unknown (please check
the addresses and re-mail the message):
SMTP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
if you feel this message to be in error.
Reporting-MTA: dns; mail.uws
Thanks everyone for your replies. In summary, my understanding from this
thread and from reading the SSLv3 spec (stop me if I'm wrong!) is this:
- cipher suites such as ADH-DES-CBC-SHA and ADH-RC4-MD5 are supported (but
not recommended due to lack of authentication); to use them, I must compile
w
For me, it works only for SSL_read and SSL_write.
As SSL_connect and SSL_accept make several calls to the underlying socket
API, the SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ failure can happen in the middle of the
processing, not just on the first read, so calling it later wont work
because it will restart from the
I can't seem to hit:
http://www.openssl.org
Is it down? It's 00:35 Monday the 20th.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Auto
Andrew Cooke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>> Although my post, in retrospect sounded like eay is some kind of font of
>> eternal knowledge, I meant just that since he wrote the thing, he could
>> explain the design decisions.
>>
>> Anyway, I've now found the following two posts which shed
On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 02:22:14AM -0500, Vin McLellan wrote:
> Without some alternative mode of server authentication, of course,
> Anon DH remains a pretty scary proposition -- all the more so because it
> implies a level of trustworthiness that it can not provide.
There is no reason f
20 matches
Mail list logo
